Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Sunday
May 14
16:45 - 17:45
Hall A
Gynaecology
Elena Manea, Romania;
Richard Pötter, Austria
2510
Proffered Papers
Clinical
16:55 - 17:05
Development of an evidence-based adjuvant treatment decision support tool for endometrial cancer
Lisa Vermij, The Netherlands
OC-0602

Abstract

Development of an evidence-based adjuvant treatment decision support tool for endometrial cancer
Authors:

Lisa Vermij1, Hein Putter2, Jan Jobsen3, Melanie Powell4, Stephanie de Boer5, Alexandra Leary6, Anthony Fyles7, Pearly Khaw8, Ludy Lutgens9, Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz10, Marianne de Jong11, Dorien Haverkort12, Remi Nout5, Vincent Smit1, Ewout Steyerberg2, Tjalling Bosse1, Carien Creutzberg5, Nanda Horeweg5

1Leiden University Medical Center, Pathology, Leiden, The Netherlands; 2Leiden University Medical Center, Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden, The Netherlands; 3Medisch Spectrum Twente, Radiation Oncology, Enschede, The Netherlands; 4Barts Health NHS Trust, Clinical Oncology, London, United Kingdom; 5Leiden University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Leiden, The Netherlands; 6Gustave Roussy, Medical Oncology, Villejuif, France; 7Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; 8Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Melbourne, Australia; 9MAASTRO, Radiation Oncology, Maastricht, The Netherlands; 10University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 11Radiotherapy Institute Friesland, Radiation Oncology, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands; 12Radiotherapy Group, Radiation Oncology, Arnhem, The Netherlands

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

In 2021, the ESGO-ESTRO-ESP endometrial cancer (EC) guideline was updated with risk classification based on clinicopathological factors and the molecular classification. We aim to strengthen the evidence-base for a prognostic and therapeutic framework in women with stage I-III EC. We hereto analyzed large, completely documented cohorts to facilitate risk stratification and support decisions on adjuvant treatment.

Material and Methods

Data from the PORTEC-1/-2/-3 randomized trials (n=714/427/660) and an independent prospective Dutch clinical cohort from Enschede (n=270) were pooled for analysis. Competing-risk models for vaginal, pelvic, distant, and overall recurrence and cancer-specific survival were built with established major risk factors (stage, histotype, grade, substantial lymphovascular space invasion, molecular classification) and corrected for age, and time and cohort effects. All models were developed in duplo: with and without the molecular classification. Benefits of adjuvant treatment will be estimated based on a systematic literature review and incorporated in the models within the next months. Model performance was evaluated by quantifying the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Internal validation was performed according to a leave-one-cohort-out cross-validation method, where each cohort served as a validation set once for models developed without that cohort.

Results

In total, 2071 women with EC with a median follow-up of 10.0 years (interquartile range 6.9-12.4 years) were available for analyses (table 1). Competing risk analyses confirmed the prognostic relevance of all established clinicopathological risk factors and the EC molecular class for overall recurrence (figure 1). Performance of the prediction models including only clinicopathological factors was good (AUCs from 0.73 [95%CI 0.68-0.79] to 0.81 [95%CI 0.76-0.85]) and improved by adding the molecular classifier (AUC increased to 0.77 [95%CI 0.72-0.82] to 0.84 [95%CI 0.82-0.86]).




Conclusion

The data from multiple large prospective cohorts of molecularly classified endometrial cancers with robust long-term follow-up data yielded clinically relevant prediction models for vaginal, pelvic, distant, and overall recurrence and cancer-specific survival. These evidence-based models accurately estimate absolute risks and may support personalized predictions of the benefit of different adjuvant treatment strategies. The models will form the backbone of a mobile and web-based prediction tool that facilitates risk stratification and shared-decision making.