Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Monday
May 09
14:15 - 15:30
Room D4
This house believes that an intensive follow up for high-risk breast cancer patients should be considered
Icro Meattini, Italy;
Philip Poortmans, Belgium
This mind-challenging debate focuses on whether treating physicians or patients themselves should be in charge for follow-up after breast cancer treatment. By discussing the possible value of early detection of recurrences, the definition of high-risk patients, tools to detect recurrences, needs for evaluation of side effects, optimisation of physical and psychological well-being, and physical as well as emotional costs of follow-up examinations and visits, the debaters will try to convince us of their viewpoints. They will focus on patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives, patients’ empowerment, and not avoid a black & white position. A not to be missed debate!
Debate
Clinical
15:02 - 15:17
Against the motion (rebuttal)
Orit Kaidar-Person, Israel
SP-0852

Abstract

Against the motion (rebuttal)
Authors:

Orit Kaidar-Person1

1Sheba Tel Hashomer, Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology, Ramat Gan, Israel

Show Affiliations
Abstract Text


The most important element in early breast cancer patient follow-up is to detect recurrences and adverse effects of treatment at a time point when intervention leads to a clinically significant outcome for the patient. The delicate balance, between required versus over-surveillance that may lead to unnecessary burden for the patient and the health system should be considered. In this debate we discuss the evidence for follow up of high-risk breast cancer patients, and how intensive follow-up might not necessarily lead to a better outcome.