Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Patient preparation, positioning and immobilisation
9000
Poster (digital)
RTT
Evaluate the Efficacy of Breathing Coaching in Left Breast Surface Guided DIBH Patients
Yin Zhang, China
PO-1839

Abstract

Evaluate the Efficacy of Breathing Coaching in Left Breast Surface Guided DIBH Patients
Authors:

Yin Zhang1, Shanshan Ye1

1Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science,Shenzhen Center, Radiation Oncology, Shen Zhen, China

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
We would like to study if a systematic breathing coaching could improve the efficiency of left breast surface-guided DIBH (SG-DIBH) radiotherapy treatment.
Material and Methods
25 left breast DIBH patients, who were treated between June 2020 and May 2021, were divided into two groups. Group A (before March 2021) consisted of 13 patients which the CT simulation was done without systematic breathing coaching. While a systematic breathing coaching was conducted to 12 patients in Group B (after March 2021). Group A patients were only given simple breath hold instruction and repeated the breath hold for 3 times on the CT couch before the scanning. Before entering the CT simulation room, an educating video were shown to Group B patients to understand the rationales of DIBH and how to ensure a good breath hold during the scanning and treatment. Before the scanning, they had to repeat the breath hold on the CT couch for at least 5 times to ensure the reproducibility. Each breath hold had to last for at least 25 seconds. They were also instructed to practise at home for 10-15 minutes every day until the first day of the treatment. Both Group A and Group B patients were positioned using SGRT system (AlignRT, Vision RT, UK), 6-field IMRT treatment technique. The treatment times recorded by the machine (Varian, Palo Alto, CA) were retrieved. The treatment time was defined as the duration of CBCT scanning and beam on time of each treatment field, patient positioning time was not included. t-test was used for data analysis.
Results
The treatment time for Group A and B were 528.86±261.64 seconds and 448.06±159.89 seconds. p value is statistically significant (p<0.05). The average treatment time was reduced by 14.9%.
Conclusion
SG-DIBH treatment efficiency can be greatly improved with effective systematic breathing coaching implementation in the department. This will further enhance the patient’s treatment compliancy and experience as well.