Impact of Target Location on Intra-fraction Motion during Frameless Image Guided Gamma Knife SRS
PO-1717
Abstract
Impact of Target Location on Intra-fraction Motion during Frameless Image Guided Gamma Knife SRS
Authors: Winnie Li1, Gregory Bootsma1, David Shultz1, Normand Laperriere1, Barbara-Ann Millar1, Catherine Coolens1
1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on the
Gamma Knife (GK) is facilitated by cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging, online
re-planning, and intra-fraction motion monitoring (IFMM). The purpose of this
study is to evaluate the impact of target location on intra-fraction
motion detected using frameless immobilization for GK-SRS through the CBCT and
IFMM systems.
Material and Methods
Patients
treated with frameless GK-SRS were included for analysis. At simulation, a
patient specific thermoplastic mask and headrest is manufactured, followed by
acquisition of a reference CBCT scan. For both single and multi-fraction GK-SRS,
the patient is immobilized in the mask and headrest, with their treatment
position verified using daily CBCTs and monitoring of a reflective nose marker
using the IFMM system. Repeat localization CBCTs was required if IFMM
thresholds are exceeded. Where possible, a post-treatment CBCT was acquired at
the end of the treatment session. The intra-fraction motion measured between
localization, repeat localization (where patient repositioning was
not required) and post-treatment CBCTs were correlated to the intra-faction
motion indicated by the IFMM log files through the Pearson coefficient (r). The
impact of treatment target location (cerebellum, frontal, occipital, parietal,
temporal, multiple, other) was correlated to IFMM and CBCT intra-fraction motion.
Results
302 plans were reviewed from 263 patients (114
male, 149 female; median age 65, range 20 - 97). The average treatment time for
218 single fraction plans was 61.7 minutes (range 12.1 – 383.1), and for 84
multi-fraction plans, 40.7 minutes (range 14.4 – 102.8). A total of 216 pairs
of localization - repeat localization, and 260 localization – post-treatment CBCTs
were analyzed against IFMM logs. For the localization – repeat localization
pairs, the mean IFMM magnitude as detected by the nose was 1.85±0.95 mm and
mean CBCT intra-fraction magnitude measured through the skull was 0.79±0.68 mm
(r=0.06). For the localization – post-treatment pairs, the mean IFMM magnitude
was 0.76±0.95 mm and mean CBCT intra-fraction magnitude was 0.68±0.68 mm (r=0.40).
Separation by treatment target location did not improve the correlation between
detected IFMM values and measured CBCT magnitudes (Table 1).
Conclusion
Preliminary
analysis suggests target location has minimal impact on intra-fraction motion
during GK-SRS. The magnitude detected by the IFMM system overestimates patient intra-fraction
motion measured through CBCTs.
Table
1: Intra-fraction motion monitoring (IFMM) magnitude and cone beam CT(CBCT)
measurements triaged by target location
Target Location | N | Mean (SD) IFMM Magnitude [mm] | Mean (SD) CBCT Magnitude [mm] | Correlation Coefficient |
Cerebellum | 61 | 1.29 (0.92) | 0.87 (0.92) | 0.08 |
Frontal | 153 | 1.32 (0.93) | 0.71 (0.93) | 0.30 |
Occipital | 46 | 1.59 (1.03) | 0.65 (1.03) | -0.05 |
Parietal | 48 | 1.15 (0.78) | 0.74 (0.78) | 0.16 |
Temporal | 46 | 1.50 (1.20) | 0.69 (1.20) | -0.001 |
Multiple | 111 | 1.35 (0.78) | 0.72 (0.78) | 0.30 |
Other | 11 | 1.40 (0.77) | 0.96 (0.77) | 0.63 |