Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Intra-fraction motion management and real-time adaptive radiotherapy
7004
Poster (digital)
Physics
Impact of Target Location on Intra-fraction Motion during Frameless Image Guided Gamma Knife SRS
Winnie Li, Canada
PO-1717

Abstract

Impact of Target Location on Intra-fraction Motion during Frameless Image Guided Gamma Knife SRS
Authors:

Winnie Li1, Gregory Bootsma1, David Shultz1, Normand Laperriere1, Barbara-Ann Millar1, Catherine Coolens1

1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on the Gamma Knife (GK) is facilitated by cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging, online re-planning, and intra-fraction motion monitoring (IFMM). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of target location on intra-fraction motion detected using frameless immobilization for GK-SRS through the CBCT and IFMM systems. 

Material and Methods

Patients treated with frameless GK-SRS were included for analysis. At simulation, a patient specific thermoplastic mask and headrest is manufactured, followed by acquisition of a reference CBCT scan. For both single and multi-fraction GK-SRS, the patient is immobilized in the mask and headrest, with their treatment position verified using daily CBCTs and monitoring of a reflective nose marker using the IFMM system. Repeat localization CBCTs was required if IFMM thresholds are exceeded. Where possible, a post-treatment CBCT was acquired at the end of the treatment session. The intra-fraction motion measured between localization, repeat localization (where patient repositioning was not required) and post-treatment CBCTs were correlated to the intra-faction motion indicated by the IFMM log files through the Pearson coefficient (r). The impact of treatment target location (cerebellum, frontal, occipital, parietal, temporal, multiple, other) was correlated to IFMM and CBCT intra-fraction motion. 

Results

302 plans were reviewed from 263 patients (114 male, 149 female; median age 65, range 20 - 97). The average treatment time for 218 single fraction plans was 61.7 minutes (range 12.1 – 383.1), and for 84 multi-fraction plans, 40.7 minutes (range 14.4 – 102.8). A total of 216 pairs of localization - repeat localization, and 260 localization – post-treatment CBCTs were analyzed against IFMM logs. For the localization – repeat localization pairs, the mean IFMM magnitude as detected by the nose was 1.85±0.95 mm and mean CBCT intra-fraction magnitude measured through the skull was 0.79±0.68 mm (r=0.06). For the localization – post-treatment pairs, the mean IFMM magnitude was 0.76±0.95 mm and mean CBCT intra-fraction magnitude was 0.68±0.68 mm (r=0.40). Separation by treatment target location did not improve the correlation between detected IFMM values and measured CBCT magnitudes (Table 1).  

Conclusion

Preliminary analysis suggests target location has minimal impact on intra-fraction motion during GK-SRS. The magnitude detected by the IFMM system overestimates patient intra-fraction motion measured through CBCTs.


Table 1: Intra-fraction motion monitoring (IFMM) magnitude and cone beam CT(CBCT) measurements triaged by target location

Target LocationNMean (SD) IFMM Magnitude [mm]Mean (SD) CBCT Magnitude [mm]Correlation Coefficient
Cerebellum611.29 (0.92)0.87 (0.92)0.08
Frontal1531.32 (0.93)

0.71 (0.93)

0.30
Occipital461.59 (1.03)0.65 (1.03)-0.05
Parietal48

1.15 (0.78)

0.74 (0.78)0.16
Temporal46

1.50 (1.20)

0.69 (1.20)-0.001
Multiple1111.35 (0.78)0.72 (0.78)0.30
Other111.40 (0.77)0.96 (0.77)0.63