Clinical experience with expiration gated 10MV stereotactic lung radiotherapy
Isabel Remmerts de Vries,
The Netherlands
PO-1699
Abstract
Clinical experience with expiration gated 10MV stereotactic lung radiotherapy
Authors: Isabel Remmerts de Vries1, Max Dahele1, Tezontl Rosario1, Ben Slotman1, Wilko Verbakel1
1Amsterdam university medical center, Radiation oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)
for lung tumors is often performed during free-breathing, irradiating an
internal target volume (ITV) incorporating all motion. If respiratory tumor
motion is significant (e.g. ≥15mm) this can result in large target
volumes and irradiation of more lung, increasing the chance of toxicity. In
addition the tumor boundaries can be less clear on a 3D CBCT-scan, especially
when the target has a low density, which makes image registration for setup more
difficult. Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) may reduce the irradiated lung
volume, butDIBH is not feasible for all lung SBRT patients and the tumor
position can vary between breath holds. Therefore we implemented free-breathing
expiration gating in our department. The free breathing removes any burden
associated with breath-hold and generally, the tumor moves considerably less in
the 50% expiration phases than in the 50% inspiration phases, reducing the
target volume. We evaluated the treatment time, ITV and residual motion of
expiration gating in lung SBRT patients.
Material and Methods
Expiration gating was performed in 10
lung SBRT patients treated on a TrueBeam® linac. Patients were treated with VMAT to a total dose of 30-60Gy
in 1-8 fractions. Typically, the 30-70% phases were used for treatment but this
was patient dependent. At the LINAC, amplitude gating was performed based on
the motion of an external marker block (RPM) after translating the phases to
RPM amplitude thresholds. Positional set-up was performed using a gated CBCT
prior to the 1st arc, and 1-2 more between arcs. During CBCT
acquisition, online tumor position monitoring, using non-clinical software
(RTR), consisting of template matching of each kV image followed by
triangulation, was used to confirm the motion of the tumor in the gating window.
ITV size was compared to that for a non-gated treatment. The times for imaging
and delivery are reported.
Results
Longitudinal tumor motion on the 10-phase
(0-90%) 4DCT was 16-31mm (mean 18±6mm). For
the selected expiration gating phases the longitudinal tumor motion reduced to 1-7
mm (mean 4±4mm). The ITV on all phases was 1.2-65cm3, mean=15±20cm3.
For the expiration gating phases the ITV was 0.7-50cm3 (mean 10±15):
a mean reduction of 38%. The total time from first set-up imaging to the end of
the last arc was 6-66 minutes (mean 19.4±10.8). 80% of the treatments required
24 minutes or less. RTR tracking showed that motion during gated CBCT
acquisition was in good agreement with motion during the gating phases on the
planning CT, and RTR positional verification corresponded with the average CBCT
shifts.
Conclusion
Expiration gating has been
successfully applied for lung SBRT. It achieved a clinically relevant reduction
in ITV size and longitudinal tumor motion compared with non-gated free
breathing. Average treatment time was clinically acceptable and the expiration
phase led to a reproducible tumor position.