Evaluation of Compressed Sensing acceleration for 3D radiotherapy MRI
PO-1610
Abstract
Evaluation of Compressed Sensing acceleration for 3D radiotherapy MRI
Authors: Frederik Crop1, Ophelie Guillaud2, Alexandre Gaignierre2, Carole Barre3, Cindy Fayard2, Mariem Ben Haj Amor2, Raphaëlle Mouttet-Audouard3, Xavier Mirabel3
1Centre Oscar Lambret, Medical Physics, Lille, France; 2Centre Oscar Lambret, Radiology, Lille, France; 3Centre Oscar Lambret, Radiotherapy, Lille, France
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Radiotherapy
preparation MRI is often based on 3D sequences. However, the use of
immobilization devices and flexible coils lead to reduced Signal to Noise ratio
(SNR). Compressed Sensing is a novel acceleration technique for 3D
acquisitions. We investigated Compressed Sensing (CS) acceleration and compared
it with CAIPIRINHA k-space based acceleration.
Material and Methods
The goal
was to obtain improved resolution and contrast in the same time with equivalent
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). All acquisitions were performed with the patient
in treatment position using radiotherapy immobilization devices on a 1.5T Sola
MRI (Siemens). T1 and T2 FLAIR acquisitions were investigated for brain lesions
and T2 acquisitions for pelvic purposes.
Sequences
were first optimized on phantom using NEMA subtraction method in order to
obtain equivalent SNR, as there were no real guidelines yet for compressed
sensing factors and denoising factors. After, patient acquisitions were
evaluated quantitatively (post-contrast T1 and T2 FLAIR) by a student t test
and qualitatively through a randomized alternative choice test (1=CS preferred,
0 = equal, -1 = CAIPIRINHA) by three expert radiologists and two radiation
oncologists through a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Rater agreement was evaluated
by a pairwise Kappa Cohen test.
Results
CS 3D T1
brain acquisitions were evaluated as superior both quantitatively and
qualitatively (rater value = 0.6, p < 0.05) and benefited from improved lesion
contrast of 7% (p=0.017, 17 lesions) due to reduced repetition time which would
otherwise lead to insufficient SNR for CAIPIRINHA acceleration. T2 FLAIR
acquisitions were quantitatively superior (resolution), but qualitatively
evaluated as equivalent with rater value 0.3 (p > 0.05). 3D T2 pelvic
acquisitions were evaluated as inferior with CS acceleration: no significant
gain in resolution/SNR was obtained and mean rater value was -0.5 (p<0.05). The
results of the raters suffered however from large interrater variability with
pairwise Cohen’s Kappa < 0.33.
Conclusion
Compressed
sensing is an useful technique to overcome the flexible coil SNR issues for
radiotherapy preparation for intracranial T1 SPACE and T2 FLAIR. However for
pelvic 3D T2 images, k-space based acceleration techniques should be used.