Perturbation correction factors of ionization chambers in small photon fields in the magnetic field
PO-1574
Abstract
Perturbation correction factors of ionization chambers in small photon fields in the magnetic field
Authors: Tuba Tekin1, Isabel Blum1, Björn Delfs1, Björn Poppe1, Hui Khee Looe1
1University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Dosimetry of small
photon fields is very challenging. Without doubt, the same applies to
measurements in the presence of a magnetic field, such as encountered in
magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy (MRgRT). Protocol for reference
dosimetry in a magnetic field using air-filled ionization chambers has been
established (de Pooter et al 2021 Phys Med Biol. 66(5):05TR02). The dose
response of diode-type detectors in sufficiently large (Tekin et al 2020
Med Phys 47(12):6509-6518) and small fields (Blum et al 2021 Phys Med
Biol. 66(15)) was shown to exhibit strong magnetic field dependence.
Nevertheless, the applicability of small- or micro-ionization chambers in a magnetic
field under small field condition has not been fully explored. This
investigation extends our previous study on ionization chambers up to a magnetic
field B = 1.5 T (Delfs et al 2021 Med Phys. 48(8):4572-4585) to small
field sizes.
Material and Methods
Monte Carlo
simulations were carried out using the EGSnrc code version 2019a together with
the eemf-macro for the charged particle transport in a magnetic field. The
user-code egs_chamber was used to model the Semiflex 3D 31021 and PinPoint
3D 31022 chambers from PTW Freiburg. The chamber’s perturbation correction
factors Pi have been simulated between 3 and 200 mm depths by
stepwise modification of the chambers’ models. Simulations were performed using
6 MV photon beam for the nominal field sizes between 10 cm x 10 cm and 0.5 cm x
0.5 cm, and up to B = 1.5 T. The chambers were positioned with their axes
perpendicular to the beam’s axis and parallel to the magnetic field. The field
size- and magnetic field-dependent total correction factors Ptotal,
and additionally, the EPOM shift ∆z of the chambers were determined from the
simulations.
Results
The chamber’s
perturbation correction factors for all investigated field sizes are magnetic
field dependent, where the observed differences are stronger in small field
sizes. In reference field size, these factors Pi, including
the water-to-air stopping power ratios, can be considered constant beyond the
build-up region. In small field sizes, the gradient perturbation shows
depth-dependence and its changes in magnetic field also contribute strongest to
the small field correction factors of the investigated ionization chambers in
the presence of a magnetic field. The ∆z-shift was also shown
to be reduced in a magnetic field for both large and small field sizes.
Conclusion
The detailed
simulations performed in this work has facilitated deep understandings of the
behavior of ionization chambers in a magnetic field under small field
condition. The influence of all detector’s components on its magnetic field
dependent dose response has been quantified, where the contribution of the
gradient perturbation caused by the extended air cavity is shown to be the
largest. The correction factors derived from this study can be used to identify
the limit of applicability of these chambers.