Monte Carlo calculation of magnetic field correction factors for two ionization chambers
PO-1529
Abstract
Monte Carlo calculation of magnetic field correction factors for two ionization chambers
Authors: Mohamad Alissa1,2, Klemens Zink1,3, Andreas A. Schoenfeld4, Damian Czarneck1
1University of Applied Sciences Mittelhessen, Institute for Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany; 2Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Giessen, Germany; 3Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology , University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany; 4Sun Nuclear Corporation , Research, Melbourne, USA
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Integration
of linear accelerator and magnetic resonance tomography is a great advantage
for radiotherapy treatment, the MR-linacs provide a high-contrast imaging in
real-time irradiation without exposing extra doses to the patient, but the
strong magnetic fields have an influence of the trajectories of the secondary
electrons. Due to the Lorentz force the trajectories of these secondary
electrons become helical. As a result, the dose distribution in water and the
dose response of ionization chambers will change. Therefore,
new correction factors are required in clinical dosimetry for MR-linacs. In
this work, the Monte Carlo code EGSnrc was applied to calculate the correction
factors kB of two ionization chambers (SNC 125c
and SNC 600c, Sun Nuclear Corp., Melbourne, USA) for different strengths and
directions of the magnetic field B.
Material and Methods
The
cylindrical chambers were modeled in detail according to the information given
by the manufacturer and placed in a water phantom. They were irradiated under
reference conditions according to the TRS-398 and DIN 6800-2 Codes of Practice.
Both codes differ regarding the positioning of the detector. A 6 MV spectrum of
an ELEKTA linac was used as photon source.
In
this study the magnetic field correction factors were calculated in different
directions of magnetic field relative to the beam axis and the chamber’s
symmetry axis and was varied between 0 and 2 T in steps of 0.2 T.
Additionally,
the effective point of measurement for the chamber SNC 125c was determined, by comparing the depth dose
curve in a small water voxel and the depth dose curve in the chamber in absence
and presence of magnetic field.
Results
In case, where the magnetic field is parallel to the chamber axis (Bx), kB of the SNC 600c and the SNC 125c changes in
dependence of the magnetic field strength Bx
up to 1% and 0.5% respectively. In this case the Lorenz force directs the
secondary electrons perpendicular to the chamber axis, as a result the
correction factor kB is symmetrical
around Bx = 0 T.
If the magnetic field is perpendicular to the chamber axis (By), the change is up to 7%
and 2.3% respectively, and the Lorenz force directs the secondary electrons in
the direction of the stem or the chamber tip. The
variation of kB as a
function of B is somewhat larger
applying the TRS-398 protocol than applying the German DIN protocol.
Conclusion
In this study, the kB values
for two different ion chambers and two different Codes of Practice in different
magnetic field strengths were determined. In case where the external magnetic
field B is parallel the chamber axis,
the variation of kB as a
function of the magnetic field is within 1.5% even for the large-volume SNC 600c
chamber.