Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Mixed sites/palliation
6026
Poster (digital)
Clinical
On how treatment over weekends palliate scheduled and unscheduled interruptions.
Eva Maria Ambroa Rey, Spain
PO-1466

Abstract

On how treatment over weekends palliate scheduled and unscheduled interruptions.
Authors:

EVA MARIA AMBROA REY1, Teresa Valdivielso1, Julia García-Miguel1, María Lizondo1, Toni Ramírez1, Ángel Infestas1, David Navarro1, Ángel Lorenzo1, Marc Parcerisa1, Ramón Pujol1, Úrsula Gallardo1, Annie Peralta1, Ana López1, Débora Amat1, Gemma Frontera1, Montserrat Colomer1

1Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Medical Physics Unit, Radiation Oncology Department, Terrasa (Barcelona), Spain

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

To manage interruptions in radiotherapy treatments and avoid the prolongation of overall treatment time (OTT), treatments during the weekends were introduced in 2019. We have performed a comparison with the previous year (2018) to analyze the differences in terms of treatment delays. 

Material and Methods

Treatments on Saturdays were added if during the week a scheduled (machine preventive maintenance or public holiday) or unscheduled interruption (machine breakdown) was present. We used a system based on categories to prioritize treatments and decide which patients were treated on Saturdays.

We have compared the OTT and days of delay for 844 patients treated in 2018 and 890 treated in 2019. 

Results

Mean overall treatment delay was 4.5 days (4 days median value) during 2018 and 3.4 days during 2019 (3 days median value). This means a reduction of 25.8%. In addition, a classification into intervals (0-2, 3-5, 6-10, and more than 10 days), according to the delay, was performed for a deeper analysis. Figure 1 shows the percentage of patients regarding the delay interval per year.


Figure 1. Delay intervals for each year.


In total, there is a 12% reduction in the ‘0-2 day interval’, a 7% reduction in the ‘6-10 day interval’, and a 3% reduction for ‘> 10 days’ interval. In addition, during 2019, 5% of the treatments were completed before the estimated finish date (between 1 to 3 days earlier).

If we look at treatment delay for pathology (Table 1), the OTT was reduced by 62% for rectum treatments, 38% for H&N, 35% for esophagus, 31% for gynecological, 31% for lung, and 18% for breast. Treatments with higher priorities had a higher reduction in the OTT in most cases.

Localization

2018 Delay (days)

2019 Delay (days)

OTT Reduction

H&N

8.0

5.0

38%

Gynecological

5.4

3.7

31%

SBRT

0

0.3

Same

Rectum

5.3

2.0

62%

Lung

4.9

3.4

31%

Esophagus

5.5

3.6

35%

CNS

5.0

4.3

14%

Prostate

5.0

5.4

Same

Breast

4.5

3.7

18%

Other

4.8

2.6

46%

Palliative

1.4

1.1

21%

Table 1. Delay mean value for each localization and year

Finally, regarding the type of unscheduled interruptions, 25% of the patients suffered at least one interruption for machine breakdown during 2018. This value was 30% for the patients treated in 2019. 




Conclusion

Introducing treatments over the weekend is a solution to prevent or manage unplanned prolongation of radiotherapy treatments. Also, the prioritizations of patients whose radiotherapy treatments have been interrupted are essential to compensate for the anticipated prolongation. Patients with higher priorities (more risk) result in a higher decrease of the OTT.