Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Mixed sites/palliation
6026
Poster (digital)
Clinical
The impact of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with thymomas and thymic carcinomas
Gianluca Vullo, Italy
PO-1458

Abstract

The impact of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with thymomas and thymic carcinomas
Authors:

Gianluca Vullo1, Giuseppe Facondo1, Riccardo Carlo Sigillo1, Alfredo Priore1, Margherita Rotondi2, Maurizio Valeriani3, Vitaliana De Sanctis1, Mattia Falchetto Osti1

1UO Radioterapia Oncologica, Sapienza Università di Roma, AOU Sant'Andrea Roma, Radiation Oncology, Rome, Italy; 2UO Radioterapia Oncologica, Sapienza Università di Roma, AOU Sant'Andrea Roma , Radiation Oncology, Rome, Italy; 3UO Radioterapia Oncologica, Sapienza Università di Roma, AOU Sant'Andrea Roma, Radiation Oncology, Rome, Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

The role of postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy (PORT) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and toxicities of PORT in a series of patients with thymoma or thymic carcinoma.

Material and Methods

We retrospectively analysed 27 consecutive patients (17 thymomas, 8 thymic carcinomas) who underwent surgery with a curative intent and PORT to the mediastinal surgical bed and microscopic/macroscopic disease, if present, from 2006 to 2020 at our institution. Eight patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery.  Surgical margins status was reported as follow: R0 resection (microscopic negative margin) was achieved in 14 patients, R1 (microscopic positive margin) in 11 patients and R2 (macroscopic positive margin) in 2 patients. According to Masaoka-Koga staging system 4, 6, 13 and 4 patients were stage I, II, III and IV of disease, respectively. Acute toxicities were graded according to the RTOG/EORTC scor­ing system and late toxicities where scored according to the SOMA (symptoms, objective, management, analytic) scoring system. The Kaplan Meier method was used to assess overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and metastases-free survival (MFS). Sub-group analysis was performed stratifying patients with R0 vs R1-2 resection margins, patients staged I-II vs III-IV stages and patients with A-AB-B1 vs B2-B3-0 histologies.

Results

PORT was administered with 3-dimesional conformal radiotherapy in 23 patients while 4 patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The median planning target volume (PTV) was 250cc (range 60-610). Median dose was 54 Gy delivered using conventional fractionation (2 Gy daily). Median follow-up was 54 months. OS at 1- and 5-years was 96.3% and 89%. One- and 5-year RFS was 100% and 83%. MFS at 1- and 5-years was 92% and 67%. Patients with stages III-IV had worst 5-yers OS and MFS compared to stages III-IV, 83 vs 100% (CI 95%: 1.16-2.06; p 0.03) and 45 vs 100% (CI 95%: 1.42-2.8; p 0.01). WHO histologies B2-B3-0 showed worst 5-years OS and MFS compared to A-AB-B1 group, 82.6 vs 100% (CI 95%: 1.27-2.2; p 0.02) and 46.6 vs 100% (CI 95%: 1.2-2.6; p 0.02) . No acute nor late G3-4 toxicities were observed.

Conclusion

PORT in patients with thymic malignancies achieved good local control and a safe toxicity profile. Patients with III and IV Masaoka stage and WHO B2-B3-0 histology had significant worst OS and MFS.