Remote monitoring during radiotherapy – recruitment for an eHealth study under the Covid19 pandemic
Cecilie Holländer-Mieritz,
Denmark
PO-1441
Abstract
Remote monitoring during radiotherapy – recruitment for an eHealth study under the Covid19 pandemic
Authors: Helle Pappot1, Cecilie Holländer-Mieritz2, Emma B. Steen-Olsen1, Allan Green3, Claus A. Kristensen4, Ivan R. Vogelius5
1Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Rigshospitalet; University Hospital of Copenhagen, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3The Capital Region of Denmark, Department of teleHealth, Copenhagen, Denmark; 4Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Oncology, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen, Denmark; 5Rigshospitalet, university Hospital of Copenhagen, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen, Denmark
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
During the
Covid19 pandemic the health care sector has been using eHealth to a larger extend than earlier. There have been a renewed focus on how and where to use eHealth. Ongoing
technological advances in wearable sensors allow for real-time collection of objective data. Consumer
wearables can collect biometric sensor data, and a smartwatch allows for objective health
data monitoring outside hospital with minimal effort for the patient. Patients with head and neck cancer
(HNC) experience severe side effects during radiotherapy (RT). We hypothesize that smartwatches might be helpful tools to aid vulnerable HNC
patients to better overcome a burdensome treatment such as RT. Before investigating
the possible effect of optimizing the trajectory for HNC patients using
smartwatches, we designed and performed a feasibility study. This is an
evaluation of the recruitment in an RT eHealth study during the Covid19
pandemic.
Material and Methods
In a
prospective, single cohort trial conducted at Rigshospitalet, Department of Oncology, Denmark
from January 22nd to October 15th, 2021 screening-log and
inclusion-log have been documented. Patients ≥18 years planned to primary or
post-operative curatively intended RT for HNC were eligible. Patients were
primarily approached by nurses in the HNC out-patient clinic after a research
assistant had screened the program for eligible patients. Consenting patients were
asked to wear an Apple Watch continuously during RT and until 2 weeks after end
of RT, in total 12-14 weeks. Demographic data, objective toxicity scores and hospitalizations
were documented. Included patients borrowed a smartwatch and a smartphone. These
hardware were set-up for the specific study solely and could not be used for
private purposes.
Results
During nine-month
recruitment period 64 patients, 50 men and 14 women aged 30-82 years, were
screened for enrollment at Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen,
Denmark. 37 of 64 patients were never asked due to the health care
professionals’ assessment and in 15/37 no reason for missing information to
patients was recorded. Seven were included, 6 men and 1 woman aged 50-68 years.
20 out of 64 patients declined participation. 12/37 were not asked because of
competing protocols. 4/64 patients had disseminated disease, not identified
initially.
Conclusion
Aiming at
performing a study to assess the feasibility of using the Apple Watch for home
monitoring of patients with HNC during RT we experienced a very low
recruitment-rate. Though remote
monitoring intuitively may lead to early identification of
symptoms and secure
timely intervention for symptom management, neither HNC
patients undergoing RT nor health care professionals seemed willing to be
included or include patients in a feasibility study investigating the use of
such a new eHealth tool during RT. Before implementing eHealth solutions, it seems important
to investigate if these are warranted, feasible and acceptable by both patients
and health care professionals.