Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Urology
6018
Poster (digital)
Clinical
Hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer
Fabio Matrone, Italy
PO-1422

Abstract

Hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer
Authors:

Fabio Matrone1, Giuseppe Fanetti1, Alberto Revelant1, Jerry Polesel2, Paola Chiovati3, Giovanni Franchin1, Roberto Bortolus1

1Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Division of Radiation Oncology, Aviano, Italy; 2Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Aviano, Italy; 3Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Division of Medical Physics, Aviano, Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Hypofractionation in salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostatic cancer after prostatectomy  is a debated issue. We report the outcomes of 2 moderately hypofractionated schedules in pts who received SRT to prostate bed for BCR.

Material and Methods

Pts treated with Image Guided-VMAT and a total dose of 65 Gy/26 fractions (Group A; BED=173.4 Gy for α/β=1.5) or 66 Gy/30 (Group B; BED=162.8 Gy for α/β=1.5) were considered. Inclusion criteria were: pN0/pNx, PSA at BCR ≥ 0.2 ng/ml and ≤ 1 ng/ml, no evidence of pelvic/extrapelvic disease at restaging (when indicated), no pelvic irradiation or boost on macroscopic local recurrence, follow-up ≥2 years and available pre/post SRT data. Concomitant ADT was used prevalently in pts with high risk features. Early and late toxicities were assessed using CTCAE Vers. 4.0. 

Results

150 pts were identified (Tab 1). Median follow-up was 67  months (IQR: 52-81) in group A and 38 (IQR: 30-46) in Group B (p<0.001). 3-year recurrence rate of biochemical, local and distant failure in Group A and Group B were  30.6% and 32.2% (p=0.928), 4.2% and 6.1% (p=0.562), 23.5% and 25.9% (p=0.961), respectively (Fig 1). Among pts with a distant failure pattern of relapse, 23 pts (82.1%) in Group A and 15 (71.4%) in Group B had oligometastatic relapse (p=0.494); 5 pts (17.9%) in Group A and 6 (28.6%) in Group B had polimetastatic relapse. 5 pts in Group A (2 oligoprogressive pts) and 4 pts in Group B (1 oligoprogressive pt) developed mCRPC; median hormone-sensitive time was 57 months in Group A and 14 in Group B. 3-year OS was 100% in group A and 92.2% pts in Group B (p=0.158), disease specific OS was 100% in Group A and 96.1% in Group B (p=0.319). On multivariate analysis, ISUP score ≥4 was associated with worse biochemical failure (HR=2.29, 95% CI: 1.25-4.23; p=0.008); ISUP score≥4 (HR=2.08, 95% CI: 1.05-4.10, p=0.036) and time to BCR<24 months (HR=2.24, 95% CI: 1.09-4.62, p=0.028) were significantly associated with worse distant failure. Among pts undergoing concomitant ADT, pts in Group A reported a lower rate of biochemical (HR=0.19; 95% CI: 0.07-0.52) and distant failure (HR=0.17; 95% CI: 0.06-0.49) than Group B (Fig 1). A significantly higher late genitourinary toxicity rate was observed in Group A (p=0.032).

Conclusion

Although the study was limited by the retrospective design, the relative shortness of the median follow-up and the small number of pts in some of the evaluated subgroups, our analysis did not show any significant difference in outcome between the 2 treatment schedules except for a greater late genitourinary toxicity in the higher BED group. Our finding of improved biochemical and distant disease control with a higher BED hypofractionation and concomitant ADT indicates the need to improve the selection of pts who may benefit from integrated and intensificated SRT.