Early Outcomes with Linac-based Dose-escalated Prostate SBRT and Real-Time Electromagnetic Tracking
Raffaella Lucchini,
Italy
PO-1419
Abstract
Early Outcomes with Linac-based Dose-escalated Prostate SBRT and Real-Time Electromagnetic Tracking
Authors: Raffaella Lucchini1,2, Denis Panizza3, Riccardo Ray Colciago1,2, Paolo Caricato4, Valeria Faccenda4, Stefano Arcangeli5,2
1University of Milan Bicocca, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milan, Italy; 2ASST Monza, Radiation Oncology Department, Monza, Italy; 3ASST Monza, Monza, Medical Physics Department, Monza, Italy; 4ASST Monza, Medical Physics Department, Monza, Italy; 5University of Milan Bicocca, School of Medicine and Surgery, Monza, Italy
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
To investigate treatment outcomes and compliance in patients with
organ-confined prostate cancer treated with dose-intensified Linac-based SBRT
using a novel electromagnetic transmitter-based tracking system to account for
intra-fractional organ motion
Material and Methods
Thirteen patients with intermediate unfavorable (70%) and selected
high-risk prostate cancer (30%) underwent dose-escalated SBRT in 4 or 5
fractions (BED 1.5 = 279 Gy and 253 Gy, respectively). ADT was prescribed
concomitantly, as per standard of care. The VMAT treatment consisted in two
6FFF or 10FFF arcs optimized to have the 95% isodose covering at least 95% of
the PTV (2 mm isotropic expansion of the CTV). The beam delivery was
interrupted whenever the real time tracking registered a displacement that
exceeded 2 mm to promptly correct the prostate motion. The incidence of treatment-related
genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, patient QOL, and IPSS
scores were computed from the start of treatment to the last follow-up date.
Results
All
patients (median age 77 years) completed the treatment in the expected time and
their compliance to the procedure was excellent. At a median follow up 6 months,
only one patient developed a G2 acute rectal toxicity. No other acute nor late
Grade 2 or higher GI (rectal) and GU side effects were observed. EPIC-26 scores
in the urinary domain decreased from a median baseline of 86 pre-treatment to
79 at one-month, and returned to baseline at a later timepoint (median score of
85 at 6 months). The same features for EPIC-26 scores in the bowel domains were
92, 80 and 91, respectively. The median IPSS increased from 8 at baseline to 12
one-month after treatment, and settled to 6 thereafter.
Conclusion
Our
preliminary findings show that Linac-based Dose-intensified SBRT for
unfavorable prostate tumors does not come at the cost of an increased toxicity,
provided that a reliable technique for real time prostate monitoring is
ensured. These observations need to be confirmed on a larger scale and a longer
follow up.