Role of MRI radiomics analysis and Pi-RADS score in prostate cancer.
PO-1417
Abstract
Role of MRI radiomics analysis and Pi-RADS score in prostate cancer.
Authors: Antonio Angrisani1, Luca D'Alessandro1, Roberta Grassi1, Valerio Nardone1, Emma D'Ippolito1, Cesare Guida2, Alfonso Reginelli1, Salvatore Cappabianca1
1"L. Vanvitelli" University of Campania, Precision Medicine - Radiotherapy Unit, Naples, Italy; 2Ospedale del Mare, Radiotherapy, Naples, Italy
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Radiomics can provide quantitative features from
medical imaging that can be correlated to clinical endpoints. The challenges
relevant to the robustness of radiomics features have been analyzed by many
researchers, as it seems to be influenced by acquisition and reconstruction
protocols, as well as by the segmentation of the region of interest (ROI).
Prostate cancer represents a difficult playground for this technique, due to
the discrepancies in the identification of the cancer lesion and the various
acquisition protocols. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of
radiomics in prostate cancer detection and the correlation with Gleason score.
Material and Methods
A homogeneous
cohort of patients with a PSA rise that underwent multiparametric MRI imaging
of the prostate before the biopsy was tested in this study. All the patients' images were
acquired with the same MRI scanner, with a standardized protocol. The
identification and segmentation of an MRI suspicious cancer lesion were done by
two double-blinded Radiologists with great experience in prostate cancer (>10
years). After the segmentation, texture features were extracted with LifeX software. All the patients
underwent random prostate biopsy procedures and the presence of prostate
cancer, as well as the Gleason, was retrospectively collected. Texture features were then tested with intraclass coefficient
correlation (ICC) analysis to analyze the reliability of the segmentation. The
reliable features were then correlated with the presence of prostate cancer and
with the Gleason score with Chi-Square analysis, with Bonferroni correction for
multiple comparisons.
Results
Forty-four
consecutive patients were included in the present analysis. In 26 patients
(59,1%) the prostate biopsy confirmed the presence of prostate cancer, which was
scored as Gleason 6 in 6 patients (13,6%), Gleason 3+4 in 8 patients (18,2), and
Gleason 4+3 in 12 patients (27.3%). Chi-square
analysis showed that only GLCM-ContrastDWI400 and GLCM-dissimilarityDWI400
were significantly correlated with both the presence of prostate cancer
(respectively p:0,007 and p:0,012) and the Gleason score (respectively p:0,012
and p:0,024).
Conclusion
Despite issues of reproducibility, correlations with
prostate cancer detection and Gleason score are still promising although we remark the need to further study the potential of MRI radiomics in
prostate cancer in a clinical setting.