Adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in patiens with prostate cancer: a monocentric experience
PO-1383
Abstract
Adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in patiens with prostate cancer: a monocentric experience
Authors: Elisa Calistri1, Taiusha Fuentes1, Riccardo Morganti2, Aldo Sainato1, Bruno Manfredi1, Fabrizio Matteucci1, Francesco Pasqualetti1, Fabiola Paiar1
1University Hospital of Pisa, Oncological Radiotherapy, Pisa, Italy; 2University Hospital of Pisa, Statistics Department, Pisa, Italy
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Purpose: A much debated
topic in prostate cancer therapy concerns the correct timing of radiotherapy
(RT) in subjects undergoing radical prostatectomy. Recently, Radicals-RT trial
showed comparable results between patients undergoing adjuvant RT, immediately
after surgery, and those undergoing salvage radiotherapy at the time of a biochemical
relapse. The purpose of our work is to verify the thesis supported by the
RADICALS study in order to investigate the best timing to plan post-operative
radiotherapy.
Material and Methods
Material and
Methods: We conducted a
retrospective study on 249 patients with operated prostate cancer
(prostatectomy alone or prostatectomy plus lymphadenectomy) divided according
to postoperative PSA in three groups: a first group of 40 patients with
postoperative PSA> 0.5 ng / ml; a second group of 209 patients with postoperative
PSA < 0.5 ng / ml; within this second group there was a further subgroup of
165 patients with postoperative PSA < 0.2 ng / ml. All patients were studied
according to the following criteria: Gleason Score, age, type of surgery, risk
class, PSA at diagnosis, postoperative PSA, number of lymph nodes removed, pTNM
and margin status. From January 2011 to December 2019, all these 249 subjects
underwent RT: 158 patients were treated with adjuvant RT (135 only on the
prostate lodge and 23 on the lodge and lymph node drainages), and 91 with
salvage RT (77 only on the prostate lodge and 14 on prostatic lodge and lymph
node drainages). All patients were treated on the prostate bed (70-72 Gy using a
standard regimen or 63-65.80 Gy using a hypofractionated regimen) and only
selected patients in on lymph node drains chains (50.40 Gy in 28 fractions with
possible boost up to 65.80 Gy on positive lymph nodes). The median follow-up
was 63 months (Range 18-116 months).
Results
Results: We did a
multivariate analysis of Progression Free Survival factors risk by step-wise
method finding: in the group of all 249 patients for those with adjuvant RT group
vs rescue RT HR = 3,195 ( 95% CI: 1,534-6,655 with p= 0,002). In the group of
PSA < 0.5ng/ml for those with adjuvant RT group vs rescue RT HR= 3,763 ( 95%
CI: 1,509-9,380 with p=0,004). In the last group of PSA < 0.2ng/ml, the
p-value was 0.35.
Conclusion
Conclusion: These results show a similar trend between
adjuvant RT and salvage RT only in subjects with postoperative PSA < 0.2 ng
/ ml, while, in other populations, the adjuvant RT has a better outcome. In light of these results, salvage
radiotherapy should be planned as soon as the PSA value exceeds 0.2 ng / mL.