Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Urology
6018
Poster (digital)
Clinical
AN ALTERNATIVE SALVAGE-RADIOTHERAPY FOR RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER AFTER LDR-BRACHYTHERAPY
Oscar Muñoz Muñoz, Spain
PO-1378

Abstract

AN ALTERNATIVE SALVAGE-RADIOTHERAPY FOR RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER AFTER LDR-BRACHYTHERAPY
Authors:

Oscar Muñoz Muñoz1, ELIAS GOMIS SELLES2, ANA MARIA BURGUEÑO CABALLERO2, PATRICIA CABRERA ROLDÁN2, DAVID MIGUEL MUÑOZ CARMONA2, BLAS DAVID DELGADO LEON2

1H. U. Virgen del Rocio, Oncology Radiation Therapy, Sevilla, Spain; 2Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Oncology Radiation Therapy, SEVILLA, Spain

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

This retrospective study evaluated at the tolerability and outcomes of salvage external beam radiotherapy (S-EBRT) for locally recurrent prostate cancer (LRPC) after definitive prostate brachytherapy (BQ)

Material and Methods

Between October 2012 and June 2021, 15 patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after brachytherapy (BQ) with biopsy-proven local-only recurrence and uroflowmetry test measure QMax > 12 ml/s and IPSS < 12, were planned to receive Salvage-EBRT: 60Gy +/- 55,2Gy (24 fractions at 5/weeks) to the prostate and seminal vesicles respectively; VMAT/IMRT technology with daily IGRT, previously urinary catheterization throughout the all treatment; The target volume consisted of the CTVp: prostate and CTVv: seminal vesicles; PTVp: CTVp + 3-5mm and PTVv: CTVv + 3-5mm and finally, the organs at risk (OARs) were delimited Bladder, urethra, rectum, femoral-heads, penis bulb. We evaluated biochemical failure (BF) was definited as PSA < post-treatment nadir+2, overall survival (OS), and acute/late gastrointestinal-urinary toxicities (CTCAE v 4.03) weekly during radiotherapy treatment and monthly after completion of treatment.

Results

The median age of 67 years (range 59-74). 47% (7/15) were low risk, 27% (4/15) intermediate risk, 6%(1/15) high risk and 20% (3/15) not specified. Median follow-up was 13 months (range 1-101,9m). Patients were treated in IMRT/VMAT (10/5).  All patients received 60Gy (2.5 Gy/fraction) to the prostate and 27% (4/15) 55.2Gy (2,3 Gy/fr) to the seminal vesicles. Furthermore, 33,3% (5/15) received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) concurrent for a median 6 months, starting 2 months prior RT. All patients completed EBRT. No patient has presented BF since the end of treatment with a median PSA nadir 0,18ng/mL (0,01-0,40), in an unspecified nadir PSA patient due to short follow-up period. All patients are alive at the present time. 

And acute/late gastrointestinal-urinary toxicities (CTCAE v 4.03): 33,3% (5/15) patients had acute urinary toxicities Grade > 3. In addition, Rectitis Grade > 2 were observed in 13,3% (2/15); No acute grade 4/5 toxicities were noted. Chronic toxicity, no grade Grade > 3 toxicities were noted.

Conclusion
Our data suggest that the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer with salvage External Beam Radiotherapy could provide adequate disease control and result in a safe technique that provides the patient with an alternative in the natural history of their disease.