SBRT for locally recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy and post-operative radiotherapy
Wojciech Majewski,
Poland
PO-1365
Abstract
SBRT for locally recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy and post-operative radiotherapy
Authors: Wojciech Majewski1, Bartlomiej Goc1, Donata Graupner1, Marcin Miszczyk1
1Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Radiotherapy Department, Gliwice, Poland
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Patients with local recurrence after
prostatectomy and post-operative radiotherapy are a real challenge for salvage treatment. The local treatment
options are limited and literature on that issue is scarce. This study aims to
evaluate the value of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the
treatment of local recurrence, in patients who had already undergone salvage or
adjuvant post-prostatectomy radiotherapy to the prostate bed.
Material and Methods
The study group consists of 23 patients with
locally recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy and salvage (20; 87%) or
adjuvant (3; 13%) radiotherapy, treated with salvage SBRT between 2014 and 2020,
at a mean age of 69 years (51-80). The mean pre-SBRT PSA level was 4.62 ng/ml
(0.008-39 ng/ml), 14 patients (61%) had ISUP Grade Group (GG) of ≤3, and 9 patients (39%) had GG ≥4. The average time between
salvage/adjuvant RT and local recurrence was 5 years. The recurrence was
retrovesical in 12 (52%), periurethral in 9 (39%), and both regions were
involved in two (9%) patients. In 14 patients (61%) local recurrence was the only
site of failure, whereas in 9 patients (39%) it was accompanied by
oligometastatic regional (8; 35%) or distant lesions (1; 4%), which were also treated
with SBRT. All patients were treated with focal SBRT to the local failure with
dose per fraction ranging from 5 Gy to 12 Gy and the total dose ranging from 24
Gy to 36.25 Gy. The most common (12; 52%) SBRT schedule was 33.75- 36.25 Gy in
5 fractions. 11 patients (48%) were treated with CyberKnife, and 12 (52%) with
linear accelerator. Fifteen patients (65%) continued or were given ADT together
with SBRT. The treatment outcome was evaluated for biochemical response (BR)
defined as the decrease of PSA below the pre-SBRT level, biochemical control
(BC) defined as PSA value below 0.2 ng/ml, and overall survival (OS). All that
end-points were calculated with an actuarial method. The chance of biochemical
control was also assessed in relation to selected clinical factors.
Results
Median follow-up was 28 months. One- and 2-years
OS were 95% and 85%, 1- and 2-years BR were 84% and 66%, and 1- and 2-year BC were
50% and 50%, respectively. The biochemical recurrence was observed in 50% and
75% of patients with GG of ≤3 and ≥4,
respectively. Patients who experienced biochemical recurrence after SBRT had a
mean pre-SBRT PSA value of 6.9 ng/ml as compared to 2.34 ng/ml in those with BC.
The time between primary RT and local failure was 59 and 69 months,
respectively. Despite numerical differences between some comparisons, none of
the analyzed factors were statistically significant.
Conclusion
SBRT for locally recurrent prostate cancer
after prostatectomy and radiotherapy may lead to the biochemical response in a majority
of patients. However, the durable biochemical control is somewhat limited. Proper
selection of patients can be of pivotal importance.