Pelvic chemoradiation after chemotherapy in patients with advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma
PO-1320
Abstract
Pelvic chemoradiation after chemotherapy in patients with advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma
Authors: Jihane Boustani1,1, Athénais Grave1, Berardino De Bari2, Pernot Mandy1, Fatiha Boulbair3, Salim Benhmida1, Monique Noirclerc4, Paul Monasterolo1, Stéfano Kim5, Christophe Borg5
1University Hospital of Besançon, Radiation Oncology, Besançon, France; 2Réseau Hospitalier Neuchatelois, Radiation Oncology, La Chaux-de-Fonds , Switzerland; 3Hopital Nord-Franche Comté, Radiation Oncology, Montbéliard, France; 4Centre Hospitalier de Mulhouse, Radiation Oncology, Mulhouse, France; 5University Hospital of Besançon, Medical Oncology, Besançon, France
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
The
management of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is based on
systemic chemotherapy. Recently, docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (DCF)
was defined as a new option in patients with advanced SCCA with an objective
response rate of 88%. The role of a complementary pelvic chemoradiation (CRT) is
unknown in this setting. In this study, we reported the safety and efficacy of
local CRT in patients with synchronous metastatic SCCA with an objective
response after upfront DCF.
Material and Methods
Patients
with advanced SCCA treated with either standard DCF regimen (sDCF, docetaxel 75
mg/m² on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m² on day 1, and 5-Fluorouracile (5FU) 750
mg/m² by 24 hours continuous infusion for 5 days, every 21 days) or modified
DCF regimen (mDCF, docetaxel 40 mg/m² on day 1, cisplatin 40 mg/m² on day 1,
and 5FU 1200 mg/m² per day for 2 days, every 14 days), followed by pelvic CRT were
included. Concurrent chemotherapy was based on mitomycin (MMC) (10 mg/m² for
two cycles) and fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice a day at each RT
treatment day or two cycles of intra-venous 5FU 1000 mg/m² from day 1 to day 4).
Results
From
2013 to 2018, 16 patients received DCF followed by a complementary pelvic CRT
for advanced SCCA. The median number of DCF cycles was 6 for sDCF and 8 for
mDCF. All patients received the complete radiation dose.
RT had to
be interrupted because of acute toxicity in four patients (25%), one of which
had a scheduled gap. All patients received concurrent MMC and fluoropyrimidine,
but only 4 patients (25%) received the whole scheduled dose of chemotherapy. Regarding
CRT tolerance, 13/15 of the patients (87%) had at least one grade 1-2 acute
toxicity, and 11/15 of the patients (73%) had at least one grade 3-4 toxicity.
There was no treatment-related death. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse effects
were neutropenia (36%), dermatitis (40%), and anitis (47%). Eleven patients
(73%) had at least one chronic grade 1 or 2 toxicity such as rectitis, fibrosis
or incontinence. One patient had a grade 4 chronic rectitis (7%). The complete
local response rate was 81% at first evaluation and 62.5% at the end of the
follow-up. The 1-year local PFS rate was 73% (95%CI 61.9-84.6) and the 3-year
local PFS rate was 67% (95%CI 54.5-78.8). The median PFS was 14.9 months
(2.1-54.6), the 1-year PFS rate was 62.5% (95%CI 50.4-74.6) and the 3-year PFS
rate was 33% (95%CI 19.5-46.1). The median OS was not reached. The 1-year OS
rate was 87.5% (95%CI 79.2-95.8) and the 3-year OS rate was 75 % (95%CI
64.2-85.8).
Conclusion
In patients with
metastatic SCCA who had a significant objective response after upfront DCF,
local CRT was feasible with high complete local response rate. The compliance
with concurrent chemotherapy was low. The good local control rate despite interruptions
due to toxicities and low CT compliance, underline the role of pelvic RT. The
high rate of toxicity prompt the need to adapt the CRT regimen in the metastatic
setting.