High-dose stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
Hye In Lee,
Korea Republic of
PO-1307
Abstract
High-dose stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
Authors: Hye In Lee1, Hyun-Cheol Kang1, Eui Kyu Chie1
1Seoul National University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul, Korea Republic of
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
To evaluate
clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)
treated with high-dose stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR), and
determine dose parameters correlated with treatment outcomes and adverse
events.
Material and Methods
A single
institution cohort of 51 patients with LAPC treated with high-dose SABR (≥40 Gy) between
2017 and 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. Majority of the patients underwent
induction chemotherapy (92.2%) for a median of 13 cycles (range, 4-29 cycles)
before SABR, and had partial response in 56.9% of patients, stable disease in
19.6%, and progressive disease in 15.7%. Median prescribed dose was 50 Gy
(range, 40-50 Gy) delivered in 5 fractions in all patients. Twenty-eight (54.9%)
patients underwent daily adaptive SABR using magnetic resonance imaging guidance
and 23 (45.1%) patients underwent linac-based non-adaptive SABR. GTV Dmin
and GTV Dmax were defined as the minimum and maximum dose absorbed
by 1cc of the GTV, respectively. Overall survival (OS), progression-free
survival (PFS), freedom from loco-regional progression (FFLP), and freedom from
distant progression (FFDP) were calculated from the start date of SABR.
Results
With a median
follow-up of 14.6 months (range, 3.2-56.9) after SABR, the 1-year and 2-year OS
rates were 71.5% (95% CI, 56.0%-82.4%) and 47.4% (95% CI 31.3%-61.9%),
respectively. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative incidence of loco-regional
progression were 13.2% (95% CI, 6.1%-27.2%) and 45.4% (95% CI, 29.7%-64.6%),
respectively. All nine (17.6%) patients who underwent resection had R0
resection. On multivariate analysis, longer duration of induction chemotherapy
(>3 months) and greater CA 19-9 decline after SABR (>50%)
were associated with improved OS and PFS (all p<0.05). Response to induction
chemotherapy showed significant association with PFS and FFDP (all p<0.05), and
a trend toward improved OS (p=0.098). Among patients with oligometastatic
cancer, response to induction chemotherapy showed a significant association
with OS (p=0.009). GTV Dmin ≥50 Gy was related with
significantly improved FFLP (p=0.019) and PFS (p=0.031), whereas prescribed
dose and GTV Dmax were not. Grade 2 and 3 late toxicities occurred
in 12 (23.5%) and 3 (5.9%) patients, without grade 4 or higher event. Dose to
the organ at risk (Dmax <38 Gy and D1cc <34 Gy) was
significantly related with grade
≥2 late event. MRI-guided adaptive RT showed the fewer
trend of grade 3 late toxicity (3.6% vs. 8.7%, p=0.398)
Conclusion
High-dose SABR is
an effective treatment option for LAPC patients with favorable clinical
outcomes and minimal interference with systemic therapy. Prospective randomized
trial incorporating SABR is warranted to further elucidate the role of
radiotherapy in patients with LAPC.