Is a once-daily RT dose optimal for patients with underlying lung disease in limited-stage SCLC?
Byoung Hyuck Kim,
Korea Republic of
PO-1274
Abstract
Is a once-daily RT dose optimal for patients with underlying lung disease in limited-stage SCLC?
Authors: Byoung Hyuck Kim1, Joo-Hyun Chung2, Suzy Kim3, Hong-Gyun Wu2, Hak Jae Kim2
1SNU-SMG Boramae medical center, radiation oncology, seoul, Korea Republic of; 2Seoul National University College of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Seoul, Korea Republic of; 3SNU-SMG Boramae medical center, Radiation Oncology, Seoul, Korea Republic of
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
In the treatment of concurrent chemoradiotherapy
(CCRT) in limited-stage small cell lung cancer, the optimal once-daily radiotherapy
(RT) dose/fractionation remain unclear although it is the most frequently used.
Therefore, this study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes and toxicities of
modest dose RT (≤54 Gy) with those of standard dose RT (>54 Gy) and
investigate the benefit of the high dose based on patient factors.
Material and Methods
Since 2004, our institution has gradually increased
the thoracic RT dose. Among the 225 patients who underwent CCRT, 84 patients
(37.3%) received >54 Gy. Because the patients treated with RT > 54 Gy
were not randomly assigned, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed.
Results
The proportion of patients treated with >54 Gy
increased over time (p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis revealed that the overall
tumor stage and dose > 54 Gy (hazard ratio 0.65, p = 0.029) were independent
prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). PSM confirmed that thoracic RT
doses of >54 Gy showed significantly improved progression-free survival (3-year
rate, 40.0% vs 22.7%, p = 0.004) and OS (3-year rate, 52.4% vs 38.5%, p =
0.029). However, in patients with underlying lung disease, OS benefit from
>54 Gy was not observed but considerable rates of severe pulmonary
toxicities were observed (p = 0.001).
Conclusion
Delivery of a standard once-daily dose of 60 Gy should
be considered in general. However, a modest dose of ~54 Gy may be sufficient for
frail patients with underlying lung disease. Further study is needed to
validate these results.