Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Lung
6008
Poster (digital)
Clinical
Identifying the target: An audit of radiology reports for appropriate use of slice reference numbers
Rachael Wooder, United Kingdom
PO-1273

Abstract

Identifying the target: An audit of radiology reports for appropriate use of slice reference numbers
Authors:

Rachael Wooder1, Neil Bayman2, Clara Chan2, Joanna Coote2, Corinne Faivre-Finn2, Margaret Harris2, Steven O'Hare3, Laura Pemberton2, Ahmed Salem2, Hamid Sheikh2, Michelle Sumner3, Sean Tenant4, David Woolf2

1The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Christie medical physics and engineering , Manchester, United Kingdom; 2The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Networked services, clinical oncology, Manchester, United Kingdom; 3The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Christie medical physics and engineering, Manchester, United Kingdom; 4The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Radiology, Manchester, United Kingdom

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

As the capabilities of diagnostic imaging have advanced, higher levels of spatial resolution identify smaller lung abnormalities. Radiation oncologists are treating smaller and more ill defined targets. Many patients with lung cancer will have a background of chronic lung disease with associated abnormalities (e.g. small equivocal nodules) identified at the time of the RT planning scan. Guidance in the UK recommend references to image slices in the radiology reports to help the reader clearly identify abnormalities but this is not compulsory.

Material and Methods

A retrospective review of the CT and PET reports of thirty patients (4 metastatic and 26 primary lung cancer) who received lung SABR to ascertain if the target lesion was clearly identified with a slice reference number. 

Results

24 patients (80%) had a slice reference number clearly identifying the target lesion. Out of theses 8 had detailed reports with slice reference numbers identifying the target lesion and benign abnormalities or areas requiring surveillance. 7 patients out of 30 had additional lesions visible on the RT planning scan which had previously been reported on diagnostic imaging and under surveillance. There was no slice reference number clearly distinguishing the lesion requiring treatment and that under surveillance for 3 of these patients. 

Conclusion

Slice reference numbers were included in most but not all radiology reports. Where there are multiple lesions under surveillance slice reference numbers are beneficial in target lesion identification. Inclusion of slice reference numbers could be advocated as part of an error reduction strategy which would reduce the risk of the target being incorrectly delineated.