Implementation of SAPBI using Cyber-Knife:Dosimetry report and early experiences of a phase II trial
Norbert Mészáros,
Hungary
PO-1237
Abstract
Implementation of SAPBI using Cyber-Knife:Dosimetry report and early experiences of a phase II trial
Authors: Norbert Mészáros1, Viktor Smanykó1, Tibor Major1, Gábor Stelczer2, Levente Jánváry1, Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy1, Csaba Polgár1
1National Institute of Oncology, Center of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary; 2National Institute of Oncology, Center of Radiotheapy, Budapest, Hungary
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
To
report the implementation, dosimetric results and early experiences
of stereotactic accelerated partial breast irradiation (SAPBI)
following breast conserving surgery (BCS) for low-risk early stage
invasive breast cancer.
Material and Methods
Between
November 2018 and October 2021, 64 patients with low risk early
invasive (St I-II) breast cancer underwent BCS were enrolled in our
phase II prospective study. SAPBI was performed with Cyber-Knife (CK)
M6 machine, to a total dose of 25 Gy in 4 daily fractions of 6.25 Gy.
Respiratory movements were followed with implanted gold markers and
Synchrony system. Corrections for patient displacement and
respiratory movement during treatment were performed with the robotic
arm. Side effects, cosmetic results and dosimetric parameters were
assessed.
Results
At
a median follow up to 24 months (range: 1-35) no locoregional or
distant metastases was observed. The
average volume of the surgical cavity, clinical target volume (CTV)
and planning target volume (PTV_EVAL) was 7.7 cm3
(range: 1.75-27.3 cm3),
54.3 cm3
(range: 26.2-103.5 cm3)
and 74.6 cm3
(range: 40-135.4 cm3)
respectively. The mean value of the PTV/whole breast volume ratio was
0.09 (range: 0.04-0.19). No
grade 2 or worst acute and late side-effect was detected. Acute side
effects included Grade 1 (G1) erythema occurred in 13 (20.3%)
patients, while G1 oedema was observed in 7 (10.9%) cases. G1 pain
was reported by 3 (4.6 %) patients. Late side effects included G1
skin toxicity in 2 (3%), G1 and G2 fibrosis in 2 (3%) and 1 (1.5%)
patient respectively. G1 pain in 3 (4.7%) cases. Cosmetic outcome was
excellent in 41 (64 %) and good in 23 (36 %) patients.
Conclusion
SAPBI
with CK is a reproducible and feasible technique for the delivery of
external beam APBI following BCS for the treatment of low-risk,
early-stage invasive breast carcinoma. Our early findings are
promising, CK-SAPBI delivered with four daily fractions is well
tolerated by the patients.