FSRT plus systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer bone metastases: feasibility and efficacy
PO-1211
Abstract
FSRT plus systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer bone metastases: feasibility and efficacy
Authors: Sonia Silipigni1, Edy Ippolito2, Paolo Matteucci2, Barnaba Floreno2, Francesca Giannetti2, Ilaria Ridolfi2, Claudia Tacconi2, Claudia Talocco2, Sofia Carrafiello2, Sara Ramella2
1Pol.Campus Biomedico , radiation oncology, Rome, Italy; 2Pol.Campus Biomedico, radiation oncology, Rome, Italy
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
This
study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of fractionated SRT (FSRT) associated
to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer bone metastases.
Material and Methods
Patients
with breast cancer bone metastases who were treated with FSRT within 21 days of
receiving systemic therapy were identified. All lesions were treated with
LINAC-based FSRT. Treatment was delivered using IMRT or VMAT in supine position
using vacuum-locked or other customized devices. All patients received systemic therapy in relation to
molecular pattern. Local control was evaluated at least after two
months after treatment completion by means of radiological exams, while pain
responses assessed at the end of treatment and every three months thereafter.
Acute toxicity were reported and graded as per standardized Common Toxicity
Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 criteria.
Results
From January
2019 to March 2021,a total of 40 patients with breast cancer bone metastases
were identified. The median age of patients at the time of RT was 54 years. All
patients were treated with higher doses of radiotherapy delivered in three
fractions according to the lesion’s site (Total dose 18 Gy, 21Gy or 27Gy). The
most common treated site was axial skeleton (83%). 18 patients for a total of
29 lesions, were treated with FSRT and concurrent systemic therapy.
Administrated sistemic therapy was as follow: 10 patients (55.6%) received
CDK4/6 inhibitors (12 radiotherapy courses), 6 patients (33.3%) trastuzumab (12
radiotherapy courses), 2 patients (11,1%) Eribulin. The most common collateral
effect observed was neutropenia, in particular in association with CDK4/6
inhibitors. All patients completed treatment without interruptions. During the
follow-up the most used diagnostic exam was the PET/CT. With a median follow-up
of 7 months (range: 1-24 months), we recorded: patients treated in association
with CDK4/6 inhibitors had 2 complete response (CR), 4 partial response (PR), 5
stable disease (SD), 1 progression disease (PD); patients treated with
trastuzumab 3 CR, 3 PR, 4 SD, 2 PD; all patients treated with Eribulin had SD.
13 treatments determined a pain relief, of which eight a complete pain
response. Nobody developed pathologic fractures.
Conclusion
Highly
hypofractionated radiation therapy is a feasible and tolerable treatment for
bone metastases. Longer follow-up will be needed to accurately determine
response and late effects.