Ten-year follow-up of tandem autologous transplantation with total marrow irradiation for myeloma
PO-1171
Abstract
Ten-year follow-up of tandem autologous transplantation with total marrow irradiation for myeloma
Authors: Colton Ladbury1, Amalia Rincon2, Joo Song3, Saro Armenian2, An Liu1, Ricardo Spielberger2, Leslie Popplewell2, Firoozeh Sahebi2, Pablo Parker2, Stephen Forman2, David Snyder2, Andy Dagis4, Paul Frankel4, Dongyun Yang4, Jeffrey Wong1, George Somlo2
1City of Hope National Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Duarte, USA; 2City of Hope National Medical Center, Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Duarte, USA; 3City of Hope National Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Duarte, USA; 4City of Hope National Medical Center, Biostatistics, Duarte, USA
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Radiation
therapy had been tested at ablative doses for total body irradiation (TBI) in combination
with melphalan (MEL)
for multiple myeloma (MM), but was shown to be prohibitively toxic. In order to ameliorate toxicity, total marrow irradiation
(TMI), an image-guided organ sparing form of TBI, was given as the sole ablative modality during the second cycle of tandem
autologous transplant (TAT) for patients with stable/responsive MM as part of a
Phase I-II trial. Herein we provide long-term follow-up.
Material and Methods
We enrolled patients with MM in response or with stable disease. Patients had to be ≤ 70 years old and ≤ 18 months from diagnosis of MM. They received MEL 200 mg/m2 and AT (Cycle 1), and, after recovery, TMI (1000-1800 cGy; maximum tolerated dose [MTD]: 1600 cGy) and AT (Cycle 2) followed
by maintenance with thalidomide or lenalidomide, and dexamethasone monthly for up to 12 months. TMI target volumes included all
skeletal bone except mandible and maxillary bones to minimize oral cavity dose
and mucositis. Radiation treatment plans were designed using the Hi-Art
Tomotherapy treatment planning system such that a minimum of 85% of the target
volumes received the prescription dose.
Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess survival. The first patient
enrolled in 1/2005 and follow-up was updated through 6/2021.
Results
A total of 54 patients were enrolled. The median age was
54 years (31-66); 31 patients were male. The median time
between MM diagnosis and AT was 8 months (3-16). Durie Salmon
stages were: I (N=7), II (N=16), III (N=31) and retrospectively calculated ISS
stages were: I (N=32), II (N=15), III (N=7). High-risk cytogenetics [t(4;14)
(n=1), a variant of t(4;14), or del 17/p53 (n=4)] were observed in 11% of
patients. Forty-four of 54 patients (81.5%) received TAT per-protocol. Thirty patients
(55.6%) received TAT at the MTD TMI dose of 1600 cGy. Median follow-up among survivors was 12 years (range: 9.2-15.5+). There
were no graft failures. Secondary malignant neoplasms included one each of acute
myeloid leukemia, papillary thyroid, prostate, and in situ breast carcinoma, and
melanoma, and 4 patients with non-melanoma skin cancers. In intent-to-treat
analysis, median PFS and OS were 2.8 years (range: 0.3-15.5+) and 7.7 years (range: 0.5-15.5+), respectively. PFS and OS at 10 years is 20.4% (95% CI 10.9-31.9) and 38.8% (95% CI: 25.9-51.5). For patients enrolled
at the MTD of 1600 cGy, the PFS and OS at 10 years were 26.7% (95%CI: 12.6-43.0) and 46.2% (95%CI: 27.8-62.7) and median PFS and OS were 4.0 years (range:0.3-14.1+) and 9.3 years (range: 0.5-14.1+), respectively.
Conclusion
Ablative
dose TMI as part of TASCT showed favorable long-term toxicity and outcomes
given the systemic therapies available at the time of trial enrollment. The
inclusion of TMI as a conditioning regiment for MM prior to ASCT may warrant
further study in the context of modern induction and maintenance
therapies.