Effectiveness of 6D couch with daily imaging for reducing PTV margins for Glioblastoma Multiforme
PO-1156
Abstract
Effectiveness of 6D couch with daily imaging for reducing PTV margins for Glioblastoma Multiforme
Authors: Deep Shankar Pruthi1, Puneet Nagpal1, Manish Pandey1
1Action Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology, New Delhi, India
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
The aim of radiotherapy for brain tumours is to maximize dose to tumour
and at the same time preserving normal brain parenchyma as much as possible. In
Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT), image guidance on the treatment couch enables
better precision in patient setup and target localization which in turn
maximizes therapeutic index of brain irradiation by reducing setup errors
during treatment. The aim of study was to analyse setup errors in the radiation
treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) and if decrease in Planning
Target Volume (PTV) margin is feasible using daily Cone Beam CT
(CBCT) and 6D couch correction.
Material and Methods
Radiotherapy contouring and planning was done using 2 volume approach in
which Gross Tumour Volume (GTV 1 and GTV 2) were delineated on T2W and T1C
images of post-operative MRI. These were then expanded by 1.5cm to form
Clinical Target Volume (CTV 1 and CTV 2). The standard practice at our
institute is to give a PTV margin of 0.5cm. A total of 21 patients (630
fractions of radiotherapy) were studied in which setup corrections at the
time of treatment were recorded in 6 dimensions i.e. vertical, lateral, and
longitudinal along with pitch, roll and rotation. We determined the average setup
errors in all directions, whether setup errors during the first three fractions
would predict the setup uncertainties for the rest of the treatment with daily
CBCT, mean difference in setup errors with or without application of 6D couch
and volumetric benefit of reduction of PTV margin from 0.5cm to 0.3cm.
Results
The mean shift in vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions were
0.17cm, 0.19cm and 0.11cm respectively. The mean values of pitch, roll and
rotation were 1.1, 1.04 and 0.78 degrees respectively. The average 3D shift
value of all the fractions of radiotherapy combined (lateral, longitudinal and
vertical shift) was 0.285. There was significant increase in vertical shift
when the mean setup errors of the 1st three fractions were
compared with rest of the treatment using daily imaging (p value: 0.004).
Central tumours had less setup uncertainty as compared to peripheral tumours. When
the effect of 6D couch was nullified (pitch, roll and rotation were negated) all directions
(vertical, longitudinal and lateral) showed increased error with
longitudinal shift being significant (0.19cm vs. 0.27cm; p value: 0.001). The
average number of fractions per patient with a setup error of >0.3cm
were more when the effect of 6D couch was nullified (12 vs. 5; p value: 0.001).
There was a significant decrease in volume of brain parenchyma irradiated when
margin of PTV was reduced from 0.5cm to 0.3cm (difference of 45.77cc and
61.47cc in 60Gy and 46Gy volume respectively) (p value: 0.001)
Conclusion
Daily CBCT at the time of radiotherapy treatment along with corrections
using 6D couch can reduce setup error margins which will improve therapeutic
index.