Impact of pre-treatment inflammatory markers in head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy
PO-1104
Abstract
Impact of pre-treatment inflammatory markers in head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy
Authors: Deep Shankar Pruthi1, Puneet Nagpal1, Manish Pandey1, Ashu Yadav1
1Action Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology, New Delhi, India
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Inflammation
and inflammatory markers, when associated with cancer have been shown to have a
worse prognosis. As systemic inflammation leads to alteration in the peripheral
blood leukocytes, Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) is a proxy measurement of
the degree of inflammation. Similarly, platelets release pro-inflammatory mediators,
such as cytokines, which exacerbate the inflammatory microenvironment in tumors,
making Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) another marker. This study aims to
determine the impact of pre-treatment NLR and PLR on treatment outcome and its
correlation with sarcopenia in locally advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell
Carcinoma (HNSCC) patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Material and Methods
Two
hundred and forty patients of locally advanced HNSCC were included in this retrospective
study. All patients were treated with radical radiotherapy dose of 70Gy/35#
over 7 weeks along with concurrent chemotherapy. The pre-treatment neutrophil,
lymphocyte and platelet counts were recorded and NLR and PLR were calculated.
Sarcopenia was assessed from radiation planning computed tomography (CT) scans
using skeletal muscle mass at level C3. The impact of NLR and PLR on treatment
outcome (Complete Response Rate) (CRR) and Disease Free Survival (DFS) were
calculated. The median follow up of the patients was 18 months.
Results
The
mean age of the study was 61 years. Mean NLR and PNR were 4.15 and 176.14
respectively. NLR and PLR were significantly higher in elderly patients (>60
years) and female gender. Amongst sub-sites NLR and PLR was highest in
laryngeal primary followed by hypopharynx and oropharynx. Patients with complete
response had lower mean NLR and PLR values as compared to those without
complete response (2.9/ 142.19 vs. 5.3/ 209.8). The average SMI of the entire
patient cohort was 31.9 cm2/m2. As per cut of
calculated from ROC curve, patients with SMI of >32 cm2/m2
fared better than SMI<32 cm2/m2. Patients with
significant sarcopenia (SMI< 32 cm2/m2) had a higher
mean NLR value as compared to those with SMI>32 cm2/m2
(4.73 vs. 3.5). There is a negative correlation between NLR and SMI (p value:
0.08). The ROC curve cut off value for NLR and PLR were 3 and 145 respectively.
Patients with NLR<3 had a favorable outcome with CRR being 62% with average
SMI of 34. Patients with NLR> 3 had poorer outcome with CRR being 38% and an
average SMI of 30. The odds of having sarcopenia in such cases was 1.2. Patients
with PLR<145 had a CRR of 59.5% while it was 39.6% with PLR > 145. DFS
was higher in patients with lower NLR (20 months vs. 14 months). Similarly DFS
was higher in patients with lower PLR (18 months vs. 15 months).
Conclusion
Inflammatory
markers like NLR and PLR in HNSCC patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy are independent prognostic factors. Higher NLR and PLR is
associated with sarcopenia and worse treatment outcomes. These tumors tend to
be more aggressive as well.