Source path verification - Advanced Gynecological Brachytherapy Applicator (Venezia)
Hema Vaithianathan,
Australia
PD-0562
Abstract
Source path verification - Advanced Gynecological Brachytherapy Applicator (Venezia)
Authors: Hema Vaithianathan1, Tom Kupfer2
1Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research & Wellness Centre , Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; 2Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research & Wellness Centre, Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
The department purchased first set of Elekta’s
Advanced Gynecological Applicator (AGA, “Venezia”) in 2017. Since then, three
AGA sets are added in 3 years. This work’s aim was to verify the accuracy of
Oncentra, brachytherapy TPS’s modelled source (ver 4.6.0) dwell position (DP) against
the actual source position especially in lunar ovoids curved source path, prior to clinical use.
Material and Methods
AGA consists of two lunar shaped ovoids (LO) along
with intrauterine (IU) tandem. Three sizes of LO (22, 26 and 30 mm,
inner lumen 3 mm diameter) and several IU tube lengths can be configured to
accommodate various patient anatomies, while vaginal and perineal interstitial
needles (Proguide 6F Round 294mm) allow conformation of the dose to the
individual tumor shapes. DP verification in the IU tandems was done using
autoradiographs (RTQA film). While in a lunar applicator, with source dwelling
at various positions in a curved path, the centre of the source may not be
exactly at the centre of the lumen. However,
with bulky LO, the film is too far from the source DP resulting in unacceptable
uncertainties in source localization on autoradiographs. Instead, the position
of the source within the LO was radiographed with a mobile x-ray unit and a
computed radiography (CR) plate. For each LO, four DP were imaged separately to
preserve image fidelity whilst avoiding saturation of the CR-detector. A
composite image was then created in MatLab using grey-scale based image
registration. Finally, the composite image was overlaid over an image created
in Oncentra, which showed a detailed outline of the LO model inclusive of the
modelled source DP (Nucletron Applicator Library Manager ver 1.0.1.1). The 2D
vector distance between the imaged source and the corresponding model DP was
measured, along with the offset. Further commissioning tests of the applicator
included physical integrity checks, overall match of the applicator’s CT image
to the applicator model and determining the distance of the most distal DP to
the tip of the needle or to the tip of the applicator (offset).
Results
The physical source does
not travel at the centre of the LO lumen, rather, it touches the wall of the
lumen in different places as it advances into the ovoid (figure). This is
partially reflected in the modelled DP, which agreed to within 1 mm with the
centre of the source. The measured offsets (approximately 0.6mm) for IU tube, LO and the
6F needle were within 1 mm of vendor specifications. The CT images of the
applicators matched the model well.
Conclusion
Oncentra’s AGA model agrees well with measurements in
LO, IU and needles. CR is a useful method to determine the contorted source
path within challenging applicator types when autoradiographs cannot accurately
be used. Subsequent LO commissioning is
done using CT only which is efficient and less time consuming. Annual quality assurance of the applicators are also done using CT images