LET Quenching of EBT3 radiochromic films with low-energy protons
Daniel Sanchez-Parcerisa,
Spain
PD-0816
Abstract
LET Quenching of EBT3 radiochromic films with low-energy protons
Authors: Daniel Sanchez-Parcerisa1, Irene Sanz-Garcia2, Paula Ibañez1, Samuel España1, Andrea Espinosa1, Carolina Gutierrez-Neira3, Gaston García3, Alfonso López4, Juan Antonio Vera5, Alejandro Mazal5, Luis Mario Fraile1, Jose Manuel Udias1
1UCM & Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Grupo de Fisica Nuclear & IPARCOS, Madrid, Spain; 2UCM, Grupo de Fisica Nuclear, Madrid, Spain; 3UAM, CMAM, Madrid, Spain; 4Hospital de Fuenlabrada, Departamento de radiofísica y protección radiológica, Fuenlabrada, Spain; 5Hospital Quironsalud, Centro de Protonterapia, Pozuelo, Spain
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Radiochromic films, widely used in dosimetry, suffer from a decrease in relative efficiency (RE) when exposed to high-LET radiation. This effect is particularly relevant for beams of heavy ions and low-energy protons and must therefore be accounted and corrected for. RE calibrations published in the literature are not entirely consistent with each other, mainly due to the different methods used for estimating the LET of the beams. We propose a common framework for integrating available data and back it up with experimental measures using a 10-MeV proton beam.
Material and Methods
Literature data on relative efficiency for films of the EBT family was extracted from 10 different sources. Reported LET values were recalculated using Monte Carlo to extract dose-averaged, in-water average beam LET values in the active layer of the film (Figure 1, left panel). Additionally, 60 experimental data points for proton energies in the 1-10 MeV energy range were measured for each of the three film types under study: EBT2, EBT3 and unlaminated EBT3 (Figure 1, right panel).
Results
Measured values were consistent with recalculated literature values. Combined literature and measured data in the LET range of 5-80 keV/µm was fitted to a two-parameter model with expression RE(LET) = 1 – a · LET^b. The results of the fit support the hypothesis of a linear decrease of RE with LET, with no remarkable differences between the three types of films analyzed.
Fig 1. RE vs LET in active layer from different published datasets (left) and measured values (right). Marker color indicates type of film of the set: purple=EBT1, red=EBT2, blue=EBT3 and green=Unlaminated EBT3. Confidence bands represent 1-sigma confidence interval derived from the fit parameters.
Conclusion
An expression was derive to employ calibrated radiochromic films with low-energy protons taking LET quenching into account. The final relative error in RE using our models for a given beam energy and air gap ranges between 2% and 20%.