Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Monday
May 09
10:30 - 11:30
Room D2
Big data, AI
Ben Heijmen, The Netherlands;
Eduard Gershkevitsh, Estonia
3180
Proffered Papers
Interdisciplinary
11:10 - 11:20
Big data prediction models to select head and neck patients for personalized dose prescription
OC-0755

Abstract

Big data prediction models to select head and neck patients for personalized dose prescription
Authors:

Lisanne V. van Dijk1, Sara Ahmed2, Abdallah S R Mohammed2, Kareem Wahid2, Nanna M Sijtsema3, Brandon Gunn2, Adam S Garden2, Johannes A Langendijk4, Clifton D Fuller2

1University Medical Center Groningen; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Groningen, The Netherlands; 2MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA; 3University Medical Center Groningen, Radiation Oncology, Groningen, The Netherlands; 4University Medical Center Groningn, Radiation Oncology, Groningen, The Netherlands

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Current dose de- or escalation trials for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients generally use tumor staging (including HPV status) as patient eligibility criteria. Model-based patient selection of low, intermediate and high-risk patients could improve the effectiveness of personalized dose strategies. The aim is to develop a robust international overall survival risk-stratification model based more than 4500 HNC patients.

Material and Methods

The inclusion criteria were HNC patients with squamous cell carcinomas treated with (chemo)radiation, without prior HN treatment. Data from 3 different institutes was split into 4 cohorts: a training (n=2241), independent test (n=786), and 2 external validation cohorts: Cohort 1 (n=1087) and Cohort 2 (n=497). Data imputation was only used in the training cohort; all other data was complete.

We constructed: 1) a non-spatial clinical variable model to establish the outcome risk estimation based on the large-scale data, followed by 2) optional radiomics (spatial) component to further prediction improvement.

Training of the Cox regression models was performed with bootstrapped forward selection. The clinical models were validated in the independent test and 2 validation cohorts. Subsequently, patients were stratified into high, intermediate and low risk overall survival probability based on the predicted 2-year mortality risk; with a priori thresholds of >25% for high risk and <5% for low risk.

The additional radiomics component was developed in imaging sub cohorts (Table). The selected radiomics predictors were added to the linear predictor from the final clinical model.

Results

In the multivariable analyses Performance score, AJCC8th stage, pack years, and Age were selected for the prediction of overall survival (NB: AJCC8th stage is based on T and N stage, tumor site and HPV status). Model performance was stable over different cohorts with c-indices ranging from 0.72-0.76 (Table). The prediction model was highly discriminative for stratifying high, intermediate and low risk patients (Figure); the cumulative 5-year overall survival ranged from 92-98% for the low risk group and from 17-46% for the high risk group. The clinical prediction model outperformed clinical standard-of-care AJCC8th stage prognosis (Table).

In smaller imaging cohorts, the addition of selected radiomics features to the clinical model’s linear predictor further improved the performance in training and validation cohort 1(Table).


 

Conclusion

This international multi-institutional dataset allowed for the development and validation of a robust overall survival risk-stratification model. The clinical model showed exceptional distinction capacity to select low and high-risk patients for potential dose de-escalation and escalation strategies. Additionally, our right-censoring-aware prediction model approach provides a framework for robust clinical prediction (i.e. without refitting), and has simultaneous flexibility to add image features for further improved risk estimation.