Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Children and Adolescents: Result of Patients Treated with 61,2-63 Gy
PD-0166
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Children and Adolescents: Result of Patients Treated with 61,2-63 Gy
Authors: Meltem Dağdelen1, Sevda Kanat1, Tuba Kurt Çatal1, H.Cumhur Yıldırm1, Emine Sedef Akovalı2, Songül Çavdar Karaçam1, Ömer Uzel1
1Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey; 2 Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology,, Istanbul, Turkey
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)
in childhood was seen rarely; the incidence rate was less than 1% among all
childhood tumors. Although treatment was similar, tumor control (LC) and
overall survival (OS) rates were better when compared with adults’ NPC.
However, the toxicities were observed more frequently than adults. In this
study; we retrospectively reported results in adolescence and childhood NPC
patients previously treated with 61,2-63 Gy intensity modulated radiation
therapy ( IMRT).
Material and Methods
Between 2010-2020, 14 patients were included in our study. The median
age was 16 and the female/ male ratio was 3:11. The primary tumor stage was T4
in 42,9%, and the nodal stage was N2 in 71,4%. TPF (Docetaxel-5FU-Cisplatin)
was given for induction chemotherapy (ICT) before 2019 whereas GP
(Gemcitabine-Cisplatin) was given for ICT after 2019. Twelve patients received
ICT (TPF or GP) before chemoradiotherapy (10patients) or radiotherapy (2
patients), 2 patients were treated with only chemoradiotherapy. PTV 61,2 (complete or good partial response)
-63Gy (partial response) included the
primary tumor and metastatic lymph node for high-risk volume. PTV 54Gy included
both the whole nasopharynx and whole involved nodal level. For low-risk volume;
PTV 45Gy was covered high-risk regions and elective bilateral cervical lymph
nodes. Survival analyses were made by Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
The median follow-up time was
80,5months (range:7-139). All patients had complete responses after chemoradiotherapy.
The 5-year locoregional controls (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), and OS
were 100%. One patient developed distant metastasis (bone) 62 months after
treatment. Grade 3 acute side effects were observed as mucositis 14%, dysphagia
14%, dermatitis 21%. There were no grade 4 acute side effects. Chronic side
effects; there were grade 2 xerostomia in 50% and hearing impairment in 28%.
Fibrosis was observed in only one patient, while hypopituitarism was observed
in one patient. Radiation-induced trismus, cranial nerve palsy, aspiration, and
alopecia were not observed.
Conclusion
Using the IMRT technique with dose reduction was compared with the
historical series. Although lower dose radiotherapy was administered, local-regional control was higher and the
rate of side effects was lower in our study. Prospective multicenter studies
are needed for further dose
reduction, especially in patients with complete response after induction
chemotherapy.