Multibody dynamic modelling of the behaviour of flexible cervical cancer brachytherapy instruments
Robin Straathof,
The Netherlands
OC-0277
Abstract
Multibody dynamic modelling of the behaviour of flexible cervical cancer brachytherapy instruments
Authors: Robin Straathof1, Jaap Meijaard2, Sharline van Vliet-Pérez3, Inger-Karine Kolkman-Deurloo3, Remi Nout3, Ben Heijmen3, Linda Wauben1, Jenny Dankelman1, Nick van de Berg1
1Delft University of Technology, BioMechanical Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands; 2Delft University of Technology, Precision and Microsystems Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands; 3Erasmus University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
The
steep dose gradients in cervical cancer HDR brachytherapy (BT) necessitate a
thorough understanding of the behaviour of the source cable in applicator
channels. Whereas multiple studies have quantified source positioning accuracy,
the influence of applicator design parameters on source cable behaviour has not
been investigated. Moreover, it is also unknown how these design parameters
impinge on the ease and accuracy of catheter insertions in hybrid
intracavitary-interstitial (IC/IS) applicators. The purpose of this study is to
develop and validate comprehensible computer models to simulate: (1) HDR BT source
paths, and (2) insertion forces of catheters in curved applicator channels. These
models can aid the development of novel (3D-printed) BT applicators and improve
the accuracy of source path models in current applicator libraries.
Material and Methods
Two
types of interactions were modelled: (1) Flexitron source cable (Elekta,
Stockholm, Sweden) positioning in CT/MR ring applicators (Elekta, diameters: Ø26, Ø30 and
Ø34 mm, angles: 45° and 60°), and
(2) ProGuide 6F catheter with obturator (Elekta) insertion in S-shaped channels
with varying design parameters (curvature, geometric torsion, and clearance). Instruments
were modelled as an interconnected series of flexible beam elements or rigid beam
elements connected through revolute joints with springs. For evaluating the
source cable models, the simulated source paths were compared with centreline
data and the source paths provided by the manufacturer. Predicted catheter
insertion forces were compared with force measurements in dedicated templates, produced
with common 3D-printing methods for medical devices: digital light processing
(DLP) and selective laser sintering (SLS).
Results
The simulations illustrate curving and snaking of the BT
source cable in applicator channels. Maximum differences between dwell positions
of the simulated source path and centreline data were observed for the most
distal dwell position and varied between 4.0-6.4 mm in ring applicators of
different sizes. Simulated paths were in closer agreement with manufacturer-specified
paths, with maximum differences of 0.7-1.4 mm in the distal dwell position (Figure
1). Insertion force simulation results for BT catheters were in close agreement
with the experimental results for all channel design parameters (Figure 2), and predicted peak
forces were within 25% accuracy.
Accuracy of simulated force characteristics can be improved by incorporating friction
coefficient measurements.
Conclusion
The developed models show promising results in predicting
the behaviour of flexible instruments in BT applicators. Insights from these
models can aid novel applicator design with improved motion and force
transmission of BT instruments. Moreover, the presented methodology may be
extended to study other applicator geometries, flexible instruments -including different
source cables, marker wires or sensors-, and afterloading techniques.