Impact of rectal filling regime on interfractional seminal vesicle changes in prostate radiotherapy
MO-0309
Abstract
Impact of rectal filling regime on interfractional seminal vesicle changes in prostate radiotherapy
Authors: Sofie Clausen1, Nicoline Nyvang Andersen2, Lina M Åström1, Patrik Sibolt1, David Sjöström3
1Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Dept of Oncology, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Dept of Oncology, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Dept of Oncolgy, Copenhagen, Denmark
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
For prostate radiotherapy, the inter- and intrafraction motion of the
seminal vesicles (SV) are dependent on rectal filling. The purpose of this
study was to evaluate the effect of two different rectal filling regimes on the
interfractional movement of the SV.
Material and Methods
The interfractional movement of the SV was evaluated for 84 patients and
624 weekly CBCT scans. Two groups of prostate cancer patients with different
preparational regimes were retrospectively identified and analyzed. In group A
(33 patients and 219 CBCT scans) laxatives were given routinely for all
patients before simulation CT and for group B (51 patients and 405 CBCT scans) no
laxatives were given, unless indicated based on rectal filling on initial
simulation CT. The extent and direction of the SV movement was identified by
CT-CBCT evaluation with focus on the SV. It was identified if SV were outside
our CTV to PTV margin (5mm in all directions except cranially 8mm).
Furthermore, the number of patients that required more than one CBCT/fraction and
a new treatment plan during the course of treatment were identified.
Results
It was possible to evaluate the SV in 89 % of the CBCT scans for the
total population (Group A: 192; Group B: 365). Reasons why it was not possible
to evaluate the SV was deteriorated image quality due to metal artefacts from
hip prothesis and/or artifacts from gas volumes mainly in the rectum. Movement
of the SV was identified in 72 % of the CBCT evaluations, and more outliers
with movement > 5 mm were observed in group B (14.8 %) compared to group A
(13.0 %). In total 11 (13 %) patients had SV identified to be outside the PTV
margin at one or more fractions. The relative frequency was higher in group B
compared to group A both in number of patients, 15.6 % compared to 9.1 %, and
number of fractions, 4.9 % compared to 1.6 %. This is also reflected in the number
of patients that required more than one CBCT at some point during treatment, 27
% in group B compared to 12 % in group A, and the number of patients that
required a new treatment plan due to lack of SV dose coverage, 7.8 % in group A
compared to 3 % in group B.
Conclusion
This study
on interfractional movements in prostate radiotherapy, indicate that a strict
rectal filling regime with use of laxatives prior to simulation CT can reduce
the clinical workload, both in terms of the number of extra CBCT scans as well
as the number of new treatment plans required due to SV movements outside the
PTV margins.