Novel method of investigating hearing protection for paediatric patients undergoing RT planning MRI
Anna Crawley,
United Kingdom
MO-0305
Abstract
Novel method of investigating hearing protection for paediatric patients undergoing RT planning MRI
Authors: Anna Crawley1, Ariona Kruezi2, Caroline Thould1, Alan Bainbridge2, Magda Sokolska2
1UCLH, Radiotherapy, London, United Kingdom; 2UCLH, Dept Of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London, United Kingdom
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Earplugs used for hearing protection in diagnostic
MRI can be too large for paediatric patients
who are exposed to noise when undergoing MRI for radiotherapy (RT). Thermoplastic
shells do not allow for the use of alternative devices
The acoustic noise levels with 3 types of
hearing protection were measured, to minimise clinically significant noise
levels, maximise patient compliance and optimise RT paediatric MRI workflow.
Material and Methods
Acoustic noise measurements were performed in
a 1.5T Philips Ingenia Ambition using an OptiSLM 100 sound meter with Optimic
1150 microphone, Figure 1. 3 different hearing protection types were tested: silicone
earplugs (SEP; Boots Soft Silicone®), otological putty (OP; Oto-soft®) and foam
earplugs (SFEP; Acro Essentials®). Sound Pressure Levels (SPL) were recorded during
scanning and a Single Number Rating (SNR) was calculated as a difference
between the mean Sound Pressure Level (A-weighted) without and with protection.
Acoustic noise at ear was calculated using HSE noise calculator, manufacturer-quoted
SNR values where available and highest SPL value (C-weighted) recorded at the
scanner centre without the funnel. The results were compared to the Medicines
and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) guidelines that hearing
protection must reduce noise at the eardrum to below 85dB.
Results
The investigation showed the efficacy of
various hearing protection tested. Table 1 shows the SPL measured along with
the calculated SNR and manufacturer-quoted SNR. SFEP showed the most
attenuation. SEP and OP had a similar performance
The recorded levels of the
scanner exceed 80dB, therefore hearing protection must be worn to reduce the SPL at the ear drum to 85dB(A).
SEP is preferred over OP, although the acoustic noise results is 2dB above the recommended
level, 87dB, it does not require specialist training to fit unlike the putty. The
risk of damaging the hearing of patients fitted with SEP is minimal given short
scan times.
Conclusion
In RT there has been little research into
appropriate hearing protection for paediatrics. SEP, are recommended for use.
These measured a minimally greater noise level than OP. However, OP requires specialist
training to fit, which is inappropriate for RT workflow. This work is not only very
important in the context of having of having a dedicated MRI in RT but also future proofing patient welfare
as we move towards MR only planning.
Future work to be undertaken to ensure exam
times do not exceed 45mins and that staff are trained appropriately to fit the
recommended earplugs.