Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Sunday
May 08
09:00 - 10:00
Mini-Oral Theatre 1
09: Personalised radiation therapy
Brita Singers Sørensen, Denmark;
Rita Simoes, United Kingdom
2160
Mini-Oral
Interdisciplinary
Treatment time and circadian genotype interact to alter the severity of radiotherapy side-effects
Christopher Talbot, United Kingdom
MO-0386

Abstract

Treatment time and circadian genotype interact to alter the severity of radiotherapy side-effects
Authors:

Christopher Talbot1, Adam Webb2, Emily Harper2, David Azria3, Ananya Choudhury4, Dirk de Ruysscher5, Alison Dunning6, Rebecca Elliott7, Sarah Kerns8, Maarten Lambrecht9, Tiziana Rancati10, Barry Rosenstein11, Petra Seibold12, Elena Sperk13, Ana Vega14, Liv Veldeman15, Jenny Chang-Claude16, Catharine West4, Tim Rattay1, R. Paul Symonds1

1University of Leicester, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom; 2University of Leicester, Genetics & Genome Biology, Leicester, United Kingdom; 3Montpellier Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Montpellier, France; 4University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom; 5Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro clinic), Maastricht, The Netherlands; 6University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 7University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences,, Manchester, United Kingdom; 8University of Rochester, Department of Radiation Oncology , Rochester, USA; 9UZ Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium; 10Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Prostate Cancer Program, Milano, Italy; 11Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, USA; 12German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany; 13Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mannheim, Germany; 14Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 15Ghent University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent, The Netherlands; 16University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Cancer Center , Hamburg, Germany

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Circadian rhythm influences a wide range of biological processes, including efficacy and side effects of cancer treatment. Earlier evidence disagrees on whether risk of radiotherapy side-effects is affected by treatment time, probably due to differences in organs irradiated and time analysis methods. We previously showed an interactive effect of time and genotype of circadian rhythm genes on late toxicity after breast radiotherapy. This study aimed to validate those results in a larger multi-centre cohort with a more sophisticated time analysis and more SNPs.

Material and Methods

We collected time of each radiotherapy fraction from patients in REQUITE breast cancer cohorts. Requite was a multi-centre, prospective study in Europe and US (www.requite.eu). Enrolment was open for two and a half years through 26 centres in eight countries. Radiotherapy toxicity data was collected at baseline, after radiotherapy and one & two years later. Genome-wide SNP data was available typed with Illumina OncoArrays. The primary endpoints used were acute erythema and late breast atrophy assessed by CTCAE v4. 1690 breast cancer patients with complete clinical and SNP data were included in the analysis. Local date-times for each fraction were converted into solar times as continuous predictors. Genetic chronotype markers were included in logistic regression analyses to identify predictors of each end-point.

Results

Significant predictors for acute erythema included BMI, breast radiation dose and PER3 genotype. There was weak evidence for an effect of treatment time on acute toxicity, but with no interaction between time and genotype. In the late toxicity analysis BMI, breast radiation dose, surgery type, mean treatment time and SNPs in CLOCK (rs1801260), PER3 (rs2087947) and RASD1 (rs11545787) genes predicted late breast atrophy (p<0×05). There was a significant interaction between time and the genotypes of the circadian rhythm genes (p=0.005-0.02), with peak time for toxicity determined by genotype.

Conclusion

Late atrophy could be reduce by selecting the optimal treatment time based on the genotypes of circadian genes (Figure 1). For example, PER3 rs2087947C/C genotypes should be treated in the morning; T/T in the afternoon. We predict triple-homozygous patients (who are 14% of this cohort) would reduce their chance of atrophy from 70% to 33% by treating in the morning instead of afternoon. Future clinical trials could stratify patients treated at optimal times compared to those scheduled conventionally to determine the magnitude of patient benefit.



Figure 1. Probability of deterioration in atrophy for a patient of mean BMI and biological equivalent dose (BED) (94 Gy) for both wide local excision and segmentectomy / quadrantectomy, derived from fixed-effect logistic regression models incorporating a) rs1801260 in CLOCK, b) rs2087947 in PER3, c) rs11545787 in RASD1, d) Combined unweighted PRS score of all three SNPs. Shaded areas bounded by dashed lines show 95% confidence intervals