A basis for combining atovaquone-mediated hypoxia alleviation with immunotherapy plus radiotherapy
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Berriguete,
United Kingdom
MO-0137
Abstract
A basis for combining atovaquone-mediated hypoxia alleviation with immunotherapy plus radiotherapy
Authors: Gonzalo Rodriguez-Berriguete1, Rathi Puliyadi2, Remko Prevo1, Chris W. Pugh3, Geoff S. Higgins2
1University of Oxford, CRUK RadNet Oxford, Department of Oncology, Oxford, United Kingdom; 2MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford, United Kingdom; 3Nuffield Department of Medicine Research Building, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Tumour
hypoxia is a major factor contributing to radiotherapy resistance. We have
previously shown that the antimalarial drug atovaquone increases tumour oxygen
levels and synergises with radiotherapy in preclinical models. We have also recently
demonstrated that atovaquone effectively and safely alleviates hypoxia at radiotherapy-relevant
levels in lung cancer patients. Radiotherapy is increasingly combined with
immunotherapy, which is also negatively affected by tumour hypoxia. Since
radiotherapy boosts the antitumour immune response, increasing tumour
oxygenation during combination treatment with radiotherapy and immunotherapy
may provide further clinical benefit. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy
and safety of atovaquone plus immune checkpoint blockade prior to testing the viability
of this combination with radiotherapy in preclinical models.
Material and Methods
Balb/c
mice implanted with the syngeneic colorectal cancer cell line CT26 were treated
with atovaquone and/or anti-PD-L1. Tumour hypoxia was determined by microscopy
in tumour sections stained for the hypoxia probe EF5. Treatment efficacy was
assessed by monitoring tumour growth. An anti-CD8 depleting antibody was used
to ascertain if cytotoxic lymphocytes were involved in the antitumour response.
Mice experiencing complete tumour eradication were re-inoculated with CT26
cells and monitored for tumour development to assess memory response. Finally,
mouse weight and haematological (white blood cell count, platelet count and
haemoglobin) and biochemical (bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase and albumin)
blood markers were measured to evaluate treatment toxicity.
Results
Atovaquone
alone efficiently reduced hypoxia but did not affect tumour growth. In
contrast, treatment with atovaquone plus anti-PD-L1 resulted in higher rates of tumour
regression than treatment with anti-PD-L1 alone. CD8+ T lymphocyte depletion
completely abrogated the effect of the combination treatment, suggesting that
this synergy is ultimately dependent on T cell-mediated killing. We also
demonstrated that mice with complete tumour regression after atovaquone and anti-PD-L1
combination treatment did not develop tumours after re-challenge with CT26
cells, unlike those inoculated with a different syngeneic cancer cell line,
demonstrating that mice had developed a memory antitumour response. No
differences were found in mouse weight or any of the haematological and
biochemical markers analysed, suggesting that the combination of atovaquone and
anti-PD-L1 was not associated with toxicity.
Conclusion
Atovaquone synergises with anti-PD-L1, favouring the
development of a memory anti-tumour immune response, and without causing any
toxicity. Our results support future testing of atovaquone in combination with
immune checkpoint blockade and radiotherapy.