Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Monday
May 09
10:30 - 11:30
Poster Station 2
20: Head and neck
Annett Linge, Germany
3280
Poster Discussion
Clinical
Impact of radiotherapy laterality on patient-reported outcomes in T1-2 HPV tonsillar carcinoma
Lachlan McDowell, Australia
PD-0822

Abstract

Impact of radiotherapy laterality on patient-reported outcomes in T1-2 HPV tonsillar carcinoma
Authors:

Lachlan McDowell1,2, Danny Rischin3,2, Madeleine King4, Lizbeth Kenny5,6, Sandro Porceddu6,7, Christopher Wratten8, Andrew Macann9, James Jackson10, Mathias Bressel11, Tsien Fua1, Charles Lin5, Chen Liu1, June Corry12,13

1Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Melbourne, Australia; 2University of Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, Australia; 3Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Melbourne, Australia; 4University of Sydney, Sydney Quality of Life Office, Sydney, Australia; 5Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brisbane, Australia; 6University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia; 7Princess Alexandra Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brisbane, Australia; 8Calvary Mater Hospital and University of Newcastle, Department of Radiation Oncology, Newcastle, Australia; 9Auckland City Hospital and University of Auckland, Department of Radiation Oncology, Auckland, New Zealand; 10Gold Coast Hospital, Icon Cancer Centre, Gold Coast, Australia; 11Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Melbourne, Australia; 12GenesisCare, GenesisCare St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; 13University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine, Melbourne, Australia

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

There has been limited patient-reported outcome (PRO) data quantifying differences in risk-comparable patients based on receipt of unilateral radiotherapy (URT) and bilateral radiotherapy (BRT).  The aim of this TROG 12.01 substudy was to report longitudinal variations in PROs based on radiotherapy (RT) laterality.

Material and Methods

TROG 12.01 was a multicentre study conducted in Australia and New Zealand randomizing low-risk AJCC7 stage III/IV HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer patients (HPV+ OPC) to RT (70Gy/35#) with weekly cisplatin or cetuximab.  This substudy included patients with lateralized T1-2 N1-2b tonsillar cancer.

 

PROs were collected at multiple timepoints and included: HNC symptom burden – MDASI-HN, quality of life – FACT-H&N and emotional distress – HADS. 

 

The primary endpoint was the radiation symptom severity score (MDASI-RSS) at 2y, a mean composite score of 9 MDASI-HN symptoms items (pain, fatigue, dry mouth, mucus in mouth/throat, difficulty swallowing/chewing, choking/coughing, taste, mouth/throat sores, teeth/gums).  Mean MDASI-RSS, symptom severity (MDASI-SS), symptom interference (MDASI-SI) and selected single item scores were also compared at acute- (1 week [1w] post RT) and late time points (1y/2y) by laterality.  FACT-H&N and HADS mean scores were also compared. 

Results

There were 74 patients eligible for analysis (26 URT, 48 BRT).   Median follow up was 3.7y (1.8-5.2y).  Sociodemographic, staging and treatment variables were balanced; however larger primary GTVs (mean URT 7.2cc vs BRT 11.0cc, p=0.013) but not nodal GTVs (17.4 cc vs 20.8cc, p=0.17) were observed in the BRT group.

 

Failure-free survival (HR=1.5, 95%CI:0.3-6.7) and time to locoregional failure (HR 5.8, 95%CI:0.6-55.8) were not statistically different between the two groups.  Four regional failures were reported (3 URT 1 BRT), including 1 isolated contralateral regional failure in the URT cohort. 

 

PRO compliance was high (1y >90%; 2y >80%). The mean MDASI-RSS score (Figure 1) at 2y was URT 1.1 vs BRT 1.3 (estimated difference [ED ] 0.1 [95% CI: -0.7-0.9], p=0.75).  There were no significant differences in acute or late MDASI-RSS, MDASI-SS, or MDASI-SI scores, with BRT patients only reporting worse MDASI-SI 1w post RT (4.7 vs 5.6, ED 0.9 [0.0-1.9]).  The only individual symptom scores that differed were worse fatigue (6.6 vs 5.4, ED 1.2 95%CI 0.2-2.3) and dry mouth (3.5 vs 2.0, ED 1.5, 95%CI 0.3-2.7) at 1w and 2y after RT, respectively in BRT patients.  FACT-H&N and HADS were similar across the follow up period.  Duration of enteral feeding was 11.2 weeks for BRT vs 6.7 weeks for URT, p=0.10).

Conclusion

In this favourable risk HPV+ OPC cohort, treatment laterality resulted in fewer differences than had been anticipated, limited to worse acute fatigue and symptom interference and worse late dry mouth in BRT patients.  In view of the small sample size, larger prospective studies will be helpful to better define any benefits of URT compared to BRT.