Association between plasma hypoxia markers and tumor hypoxia in head-and-neck cancer patients
Alexander Rühle,
Germany
PD-0818
Abstract
Association between plasma hypoxia markers and tumor hypoxia in head-and-neck cancer patients
Authors: Alexander Rühle1, Anca-Ligia Grosu1, Nicole Wiedenmann1, Juri Ruf2, Raluca Stoian1, Andreas R. Thomsen1, Eleni Gkika1, Wolfgang Weber3, Dimos Baltas1, Michael Mix2, Nils H. Nicolay1
1Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Freiburg, Germany; 2Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Freiburg, Germany; 3Technical University of Munich, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Intratumoral hypoxia is known to deteriorate the oncological outcome of
head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients receiving radiotherapy.
Plasma hypoxia markers could potentially be used as biomarkers to monitor tumor-associated
hypoxia; however, the exact correlation between plasma hypoxia markers and
imaging-based intratumoral hypoxia is yet not fully understood. We therefore
aimed to examine the value of established and novel hypoxia-associated plasma
proteins as potential surrogate markers for tumor hypoxia.
Results
While osteopontin
plasma concentrations increased during chemoradiation (p=0.07), there
was a trend towards decreasing CTGF plasma over the course of chemoradiation (p=0.08). Baseline osteopontin (r=0.579, p=0.002)
as well as galectin-3 (r=0.429, p=0.032) moderately correlated with the
HSV prior to chemoradiation, whereas VEGF (r=0.196, p=0.357) and CTGF (r=0.314, p=0.118)
did not. Patients with non-resolving tumor hypoxia in week 2 of treatment, as determined
by [18F]FMISO PET, were found to exhibit significantly higher VEGF
(451.1 versus 221.7 ng/mL, p<0.05)
and CTGF (27.8 versus 17.3 ng/mL, p<0.05)
plasma concentrations in treatment week 5. Baseline osteopontin plasma concentration
was higher in patients with residual PET hypoxia at the end of treatment (38.4
versus 14.8 ng/mL, p<0.01) and
predicted residual hypoxia with an AUC=0.821 (95% CI 0.612-1.000, p<0.05).
Conclusion
Baseline osteopontin and galectin-3 plasma
levels moderately correlated with the pretherapeutic HSV and therefore indicated
hypoxic tumors prior to radiotherapy. Pretherapeutic osteopontin was also
associated with residual tumor hypoxia at the end of chemoradiation, providing
a rationale to investigate hypoxic modification based on osteopontin plasma
levels. However, as plasma hypoxia proteins do not convey any spatial
distribution of tumor hypoxia, they rather add to than replace [18F]FMISO
PET/CT-imaging for hypoxia-based radiotherapy dose escalation.