Real-time motion-including dose reconstruction for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
MO-0054
Abstract
Real-time motion-including dose reconstruction for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
Authors: Simon Skouboe1, Per Rugaard Poulsen1,2, Thomas Ravkilde2
1Aarhus University Hospital, Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark; 2Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Dose deterioration caused
by target motion during radiotherapy can be a major concern for proton pencil
beam scanning (PBS). Real-time motion-including dose reconstruction during
treatments would enable detection of dose deviations and allow informed decisions and actions during treatment. Here, we
create and experimentally validate a real-time proton dose reconstruction algorithm
that accounts for dynamic motion.
Material and Methods
Previously in-house developed software capable
of online real-time motion-including dose reconstruction was expanded from
photon to proton therapy. The software continuously calculates the dose to a
moving target based on live-streamed treatment machine parameters and target
positions. The proton dose reconstruction uses a pencil beam algorithm with
density variations modelled by water equivalent path lengths calculated by
real-time voxel traversal ray tracing through a CT scan. The pencil beam
kernels for the algorithm were established by Monte Carlo (TOPAS) simulation of single spots in water in 2 MeV beam energy steps. Each kernel was
parameterized as a depth dose curve and a depth dependent 2D Gaussian beam
profile.
For experimental validation
of the real-time dose reconstructions, a proton PBS plan was delivered to an
ionization chamber array (MatriXX, IBA) placed on a motion stage (Quasar, Modus
QA) with 5 cm solid water for build-up
(Fig 1). The plan had a single
energy layer (140 MeV) with 225 spots spaced
4mm apart in a square grid. Measurements were made twice with and once without
applying a 40mm peak-to-peak sinusoidal 1-D motion with a 5s period. The ion
chamber array measured the 2D dose distribution in dose frames with 7.62 mm spatial resolution and 10Hz temporal resolution.
After the experiments, the
motion stage position was determined for each spot delivery in the motion
experiments by comparison of the dose frames with corresponding dose frames
from the static experiments. This was combined with machine log files to
generate a data stream that each contained
the position, energy and MU of each spot and the position of the motion stage.
This data stream was broadcasted to the dose reconstruction software, which calculated the dose offline, but in real-time,
both with and without motion. Real-time ray
tracing was done through a synthetic CT matrix from the experimental
setup geometry.
Measured and reconstructed
doses were compared by 2%/2mm gamma failure rate evaluations with the
measured doses as reference.
Results
The absolute dose matched
well for the single layer plan with and without motion (Fig 2). The gamma failure rate was 0.0 % (static), 1.1 % (motion 1) and 2.3 % (motion 2). 98.5 % of the spots were
calculated within 3.0 ms.
Conclusion
A method to perform real-time proton dose
reconstruction for dynamic motion was developed and experimentally validated. It reproduced measured doses well offline. The dose reconstructions can be done online when live streaming of spot
delivery and target motion becomes available.