Optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry as alternative for radiochromic film in UHDR e-beams?
MO-0050
Abstract
Optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry as alternative for radiochromic film in UHDR e-beams?
Authors: Verdi Vanreusel1,2,3, Federica Galante4, Alessia Gasparini2,3, Paul Leblans5, Giulia Mariani4, Matteo Pacitti4, Dirk Vandenbroucke5, Giuseppe Felici4, Luana de Freitas Nascimento1, Dirk Verellen2,3
1SCK CEN, Research in Dosimetric Applications, Mol, Belgium; 2University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium; 3Iridium Netwerk, Medical Radiation Physics, Wilrijk, Belgium; 4Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A., Research and Development, Aprilia, Italy; 5Agfa NV, Corporate Innovation Office, Mortsel, Belgium
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
There are strong
indications that ultra-high dose rates (UHDR) used for FLASH-radiation
therapy (RT) strongly reduce the adverse effects of conventional RT. The
radiobiological mechanisms and exact conditions for obtaining the
FLASH-effect are, however, under investigation. Radiochromic film is generally
used for dosimetry in this field, but is subject to drawbacks such as
non-linear calibration and a cumbersome read-out procedure. Optically
stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimetry is therefore investigated as
alternative.
Material and Methods
Measurements
were performed using the ElectronFlash linac (1) which generates
pulsed electron beams and allows large systematic variation of the important parameters for FLASH-RT research. The linear response to
dose per pulse (DPP) and total dose, and the stability with pulse repetition
frequency (PRF) were investigated for a phosphor coated OSL film optimized for radiation therapy (2) and compared with EBT-XD GafChromic film (3). The DPP ranged
from 0.0-9.6 Gy by variation of pulse length and/or applicator diameter.
Total dose ranged from 0-20 Gy by variation of the number of pulses, both at conventional- and UHDR. The PRF was varied from
1-245 Hz. The OSL film was irradiated in a dark environment and read out
by a computed radiography (CR) digitizer, adapted for conventional RT.
The radiochromic films were scanned 48 hours after irradiation using an EPSON
10000XL (4) transmission scanner and their calibration curve was obtained
against an Advanced Markus (5) ionization chamber in a conventional electron
beam.
Results
Radiochromic film and the OSL systems showed good linearity with increasing DPP
up to 12 Gy/pulse (R² > 0.995) and with dose (R²>0.999). For the OSL
system linearity was maintained up to 20 Gy. Radiochromic film has a
nominal dynamic range up to 60 Gy. No
difference between conventional- and UHDR was observed. PRF stability was examined as the percentage difference from the 1 Hz signal. The OSL system
showed maximal deviation of -2.2 % at 245 Hz. Radiochromic film
showed maximal deviation of 2.5 % at 5 Hz.
Conclusion
With the good linearity with DPP and total dose, and good PRF stability,
the OSL system has the potential to be a valid alternative to
radiochromic film as reference dosimeter in UHDR electron beams.
However, further investigation of the important characteristics is
needed and currently ongoing. It has strong benefits with the straight
forward read-out procedure, linear calibration and reusability of the
films. Modification of the coating and digitizer optimization are being
investigated to further improve the OSL characteristics in UHDR electron
beams. The need for irradiation in dark conditions is currently a
drawback of the system. Also a dark fading curve is required to correct
for time differences between irradiation and read-out. This work is part
of the 18HLT04 UHDpulse project which received funding from the EMPIR
programme. The first author is funded via the young potential PhD grant
from SCK CEN.