Towards a novel way to optimize the DLG using plan complexity metrics for SBRT/SRS using FFF beams
Michel Oellers,
The Netherlands
MO-0791
Abstract
Towards a novel way to optimize the DLG using plan complexity metrics for SBRT/SRS using FFF beams
Authors: Michel Oellers1, Ans Swinnen2, Ana Vaniqui2, Frank Verhaegen2
1MAASTRO , Medical Physics, MAASTRICHT, The Netherlands; 2MAASTRO, Medical Physics, MAASTRICHT, The Netherlands
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
There
is a trend towards hypo-fractioned stereotactic treatments (SBRT/SRS) which
often consist of highly modulated flattening filter free (FFF) treatment
fields. Varian’s MLC model in Eclipse allows tuning of only 2 parameters, leaf
transmission and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG). Recent literature [1] showed that a
single DLG value, determined using a modified sweeping gap technique [2], may
lead to relevant dose discrepancies between measured and calculated dose for
stereotactic plans. Adjustments are done iteratively by measuring and verifying
dose correspondences to obtain a tuned DLG. In this work, a method based on
plan complexity metrics is described that predicts when dose discrepancies may
start to arise and effectively help to determine the optimal DLG.
Material and Methods
Modulated
Complexity Scores (MCS) [3] were calculated for 6 VMAT plans based on a simple
target geometry with decreasing MLC modulation using Eclipse’s Aperture Shape
Controller (ASC) and for 21 clinical SBRT cases of prostate, kidney, spine and
liver cancer, planned with 10MV FFF. Another 33 clinical SRS treatments of single and
multiple brain lesions planned with 6MV FFF were also included. All plans were
calculated using the Acuros algorithm (v15) . Dose verification was performed
with PTW Octavius phantom and 1000 SRS detector. A gamma pass rate (GPR) of
2%/2mm with a 80% isodose threshold, representing the high dose region, was used for dose evaluation. A 90% pass
rate of pixels with a gamma below 1 was clinically accepted.
Results
For
6 and 10MV FFF, respectively, 8 (24%) and 13 (62%) plans failed to meet the
GPR above 90% (Fig1). For 6MV FFF no correlation could be observed between MCS
and GPR, indicating a near optimal DLG. For the 10MV FFF plans a trend was seen
between increasing MCS and GPR, which was also observed in the phantom experiment
(Fig2). A MCS below 0.4 did not meet the GPR of 90%. Adaption of our 10MV FFF
DLG value lead to GPR above 90% even for the high dose regions.
Fig1
Fig2
Conclusion
Failing
GPR for highly modulated SBRT/SRS plans can be an indication for sub-optimal
DLG values in Eclipse. MCS can be used to indicate for which energy and treatment
technique the DLG needs adaption. Adaption of the DLG lead to GPR that were
clinically acceptable.
[1]
Vieillevigne, L.; Khamphan, C.; Saez, J.; Hernandez, V. On the Need for Tuning
the Dosimetric Leaf Gap for Stereotactic Treatment Plans in the Eclipse
Treatment Planning System. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2019, 20 (7),
68–77 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12656.
[2]
LoSasso T.; Chui C.S.; Ling C.C. Physical and dosimetrical aspects of a
multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing
intensity modulated radiotherapy. Med.Phys. 1998, 25, 1919-1927.
[3]
Masi L; Doro R; Favuzza V; Cipressi S; Livi L. Impact of Plan Parameters on the
Dosimetric Accuracy of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy. Medical
Physics 2013, 40 (7), 071718–071718 DOI:
10.1118/1.4810969.