Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Sunday
May 08
16:55 - 17:55
Room D1
Urology
Nejla Fourati, Tunisia;
Tobias Hölscher, Germany
2520
Proffered Papers
Clinical
17:35 - 17:45
Radiotherapy quality assurance of the PEACE-1 trial: Initial results of individual case reviews
Najlaa Alyamani, Belgium
OC-0609

Abstract

Radiotherapy quality assurance of the PEACE-1 trial: Initial results of individual case reviews
Authors:

Najlaa Alyamani1, Paul Sargos2, Pierre Blanchard3, Stephane Supiot4, Philipe Ronchin5, Pascal Pommier6, Thomas Duberge7, Marlon Silva8, Yasser Hammoud9, Ali Hasbini10, Jonathan Khalifa11, Khemara Gnep12, Christopher Scrase13, Jordi Saez14, Laure Vieillevigne15, Melissa Christiaens16, Thomas Zilli17, Hélène Ribault18, Alberto Bossi19, Karim Fizazi20, Nicolaus Andratschke21

1EORTC, RTQA, Brussels, Belgium; 2Institut Bergonie, Department of Radiotherapy, Bordeaux, France; 3Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Villejuif, France; 4Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - site René Gauducheau, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nantes, France; 5Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mougins, France; 6Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lyon, France; 7 Croix rouge française, centre saint louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toulon, France; 8Centre François Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France; 9CHU Jean-Minjoz, Department of Radiation Oncology, Besançon, France; 10CFRO-Clinique Pasteur, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brest , France; 11 Institut Claudius Regaud/ Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toulouse, France; 12Centre Eugène Marquis, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rennes , France; 13Ipswich Hospital, Department of Oncology, Ipswich, Suffolk, United Kingdom; 14Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Radiation Oncology Department, Barcelona, Spain; 15Institut Claudius Regaud-Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, , Department of Medical Physics, Toulouse, France; 16Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium; 17Geneva University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva, Swaziland ; 18UNICANCER, UNICANCER, Caen, France; 19Institut Gustave Roussy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Villejuif, France; 20Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Department of Cancer Medicine, Villejuif, France; 21 University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zurich, Switzerland

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

The PEACE-1 trial, sponsored by Unicancer, is a prospective randomized phase 3 study on androgen deprivation therapy (+/- docetaxel) with/without local radiotherapy and with/without abiraterone acetate and prednisone in men with metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (n=1173). Retrospective individual case review (ICR) is an integral part of the radiotherapy quality assurance (RTQA) process in the trial and was provided by RTQA group at the EORTC. This study describes the interim results of ICR for patients accrued in the two radiotherapy arms and assesses the compliance level to the study protocol.  

Material and Methods

A total of 59 out of 81 participating institutions have sent their cases anonymized for the extensive central review, 11% of which had their radiotherapy delivered using 3DCRT. Each uploaded DICOM RT plan were reviewed by a radiation oncologist and a medical physicist for protocol compliance of target volume and organs at risks (OARs) delineation, as well as dose specifications. The outcome of the case reviews were classified as acceptable ”A”, acceptable variation “AV”, or unacceptable variation “UV”.

Results

The trial closed for accrual in December 2018. A total of 584 patients were recruited in the radiotherapy arms and 533 complete RT plans were uploaded to the EORTC. To date, 485 (91%) have been reviewed and analyzed. For the delineation review, 64 (13%) cases were unacceptable; specifically, 43 instances of erroneous CTV delineation, 21 instances of erroneous PTV delineation, and 19 instances of missing or improperly delineated OARs were observed.

After excluding the unacceptable delineated cases, 421 cases were reviewed for dose and plan: 401 (95%) of them were either A or AV. Only 19 cases were assigned UV, mainly for insufficient PTV coverage. In 6 cases, dose constraints to OARs were reasons for unacceptable review.

Table-1: Dosimetric results of the interim ICR for OARs

OARs

Protocol dose constraints

Mean observed values (range, SD)

Rectum

V60≤ 50%

16.7% (0 – 50%, 8%)

V70≤ 25%

7.8% (0 – 27.6%, 5%)

V74 ≤ 5%

0.8% (0 – 10.7%, 1%)

Bladder

V60≤ 50%

14% (0 – 96%, 11%)

V70≤ 25%

0.8% (0 – 85%, 8%)

Femoral heads

V50≤ 10%

1% (0 - 65%, 5%)


Conclusion

RTQA is a critical component in radiotherapy trials. It is reassuring that 82% of the overall review was considered acceptable in PEACE-1. Of the limited number of unacceptable cases, most were due to CTV delineation or PTV coverage issues, while OARs were significantly less affected.