Overall, 40 pts were included for
analysis. Table 1 shows pts’ characteristics.
Twenty-eight (70%) pts were
treated after surgery, 10 (25%) with exclusive CIRT, 2 (5%) pts received
systemic therapy before and after CIRT (chemotherapy in one case, immunotherapy
in the other).
CIRT treatment schedules were given
in 16 fractions (4 fr/week) for a total dose of 65.6 RBE Gy and 68.8 RBE Gy in
22(55%) and 18(45%) pts, respectively. Moreover, 18 pts (44%) received
immunotherapy after CIRT as part of the treatment for the primary tumor or at
the relapse.
Median follow-up (FU) time was 18 mo
(range 5-81 mo). Two-years- LRFS, PFS, DMFS and and OS were 84.5%, 33.2%, 37.3%
and 58.6% respectively (see first row in Fig1). No difference in clinical
outcome was found for resected compared to unresected patients. Naïve tumor
status was associated with better LRFS (HR=8.4 and p-value<0.01, Fig1 E) and
PFS (HR=2.4 and p=0.03, Fig1 F). Better OS was reported for T3 stage (HR=15.6,
p= 0.001, Fig 1G) and age years using a univariate cox regression model. These
variables were considered in a bivariate model. HR was 4.3 (p<0.01) for T4
and 3.9 (p=0.03) for age years, with an AUC=0.81.
To analyse the relationship between
immunotherapy and CIRT we found that combined treatment after CIRT in T4 stages
was associated with better OS outcome at 30 months (40%) than patients not
receiving immunotherapy (20%). In patients not receiving immunotherapy after
CIRT, T3 and T4 stages maintained significant differences in 3y-OS (100% vs
19.2%), whereas T3 and T4 patients receiving immunotherapy reached similar OS
rates (71.4% vs 72.7%).
As far as concerned side effects, acute tox at
the end of CIRT was G1-G2 in 95% and G3 in 5% of pts. Late tox was G0 in 10%
and G1-G2 in 81% of pts; late toxicity ≥ G3 consisted in one G3 unilateral hear
impairment and 2 unilateral visual loss of grade G3 and G4, respectively
(expected tox).