Target volume time trends during daily adaptive 5-fraction MR-guided radiotherapy
Emile Koper,
The Netherlands
OC-0424
Abstract
Target volume time trends during daily adaptive 5-fraction MR-guided radiotherapy
Authors: Emile Koper1, Marjan Kamer1, Omar Bohoudi1, Miguel A. Palacios1, Suresh Senan1, Famke L. Schneiders1, Ben Slotman1, Frank Lagerwaard1, Anna Bruynzeel1
1AmsterdamUMC, Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive
radiation therapy (or SMART) allows for recontouring of both target volumes and
organs at risk prior to each fraction. Since SMART allows for optimizing
treatment delivery in response to inter-fractional anatomical and volumetrical
changes, subsequent fractions are reviewed separately. This approach will
incorporate radiation-induced increases in the GTV into planning. However, editing
daily contours can potentially reduce target volumes, and result in the
unintended use of ‘shrinking field’ radiation. In this study we evaluated time
trends in GTV’s (and CTV for prostate cancer), during the course of SMART with
daily plan re-optimization.
Material and Methods
All patients treated with five
fractions of SMART (total dose 35-50 Gy) within an overall treatment time of
2.5 weeks at a single institute using the MRIDIAN system (ViewRay Inc) were
selected for this study. Target volume data for subsequent fractions were obtained
for prostate cancer (N=463 pts), pancreatic cancer (N=129 pts), lung tumors
(N=40 pts), renal cell cancer (N=79 pts) and adrenal metastases (N=58 pts). An
analysis of time trends was performed using an ANOVA test with post hoc
analysis. Additionally, in order to investigate the incidence of substantial
target volume reduction during the course of SMART, the deviation (%) from
fraction 5 relative to fraction 1 was calculated for each patient.
Results
The
changes in GTV’s during the course of MRgRT were only modest, and on average (95%
CI) for prostate CTV’s +6.7% (6.0 - 7.3%), for pancreatic cancer +1.3% (0.2 -
2.4%), for lung tumors +1.0% (-1.6 - 3.7%), for renal cell cancer +1.0% (-0.7 -
2.8%), and for adrenal metastases +1.8% (-0.8 - 4.4%). Only the average
increase in prostate cancer CTV’s as compared to baseline was statistically
significant (p < 0.001). Table 1 shows the rate of patients exhibiting a 10%
and 20% decrease of GTV’s/CTV’s (prostate) during the 2.5 weeks of SMART
delivery. In general, substantial reductions in GTV’s were uncommon, however,
in particular for adrenal metastases a reduction of ≥20%
was observed in 10% of the patients.
Figure 1: Average GTV/CTV deviations during the course of 5-fraction SMART delivery per tumor site
Table 1: Rate of GTV/CTV reduction during the course of SMART (fr5
versus fr1) per tumor site
Conclusion
Target
volume changes during a 5-fraction course of MRgRT were modest, with only a
small but significant increase observed in average prostate CTV’s. A subsequent
study will evaluate whether such increase is indicative for acute toxicity. A
substantial reduction in GTV’s was observed for some adrenal metastases. Although
the clinical relevance remains unclear, clinicians need to be aware of the
potential cumulative dosimetric impact of GTV reductions when performing daily
plan re-optimization.