Patient specific deep learning contour propagation on prostate magnetic resonance linac patients
OC-0423
Abstract
Patient specific deep learning contour propagation on prostate magnetic resonance linac patients
Authors: Samuel Fransson1, David Tilly1, Robin Strand2
1Uppsala University Hospital, Medical Physics, Uppsala, Sweden; 2Uppsala University, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala, Sweden
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Devices
combining MR-scanners and Linacs for radiotherapy, called MR-Linacs, requires
contouring on a daily basis to be used to its fullest. Currently, deformable
image registration (DIR) algorithms propagate contours from reference scans,
however large shape and size changes can be troublesome. Artificial neural
network (ANN) based contouring models not relying on DIR algorithms alleviate
this issue. However, the requirement of similarity of the training and
inference dataset poses an issue with potential highly variable contrast of
MR-images, along with patient specific target definition not present in
training dataset. To alleviate this problem of scarcity of data, we propose patient
specific networks, trained on a single dataset for each patient, for contouring
onto the following datasets in a adaptive MR-Linac workflow.
Material and Methods
MR-scans
from eight prostate patients treated on the MR-Linac (6.1 Gy x 7 fx) at our
institution along with contours of Clinical
Target Volume (CTV), bladder and rectum were utilized. U-net
shaped models were trained based on the image from the first fraction of each
patient, and subsequently applied onto the following treatment images. Results
were compared with manual contours in terms of the DICE overlap as well as Added
Path Length (APL) which correlates with recontouring time. As benchmark, contours propagated through the
clinical DIR algorithm were similarly evaluated.
Results
In
terms of DICE overlap the ANN output was 0.91±0.03, 0.94±0.04 and 0.82±0.09
while for DIR 0.92±0.03, 0.92±0.08, 0.86±0.05 for the CTV, bladder and rectum
respectively. Similarly, APL results where 3479±1835, 7356±4391 and 6832±2362
for ANN and 2853±1687, 8571±4654 and 6395±2663 voxels for DIR.
Conclusion
Patient
specific artificial neural network models trained on a single dataset are
feasible with comparable accuracy to DIR.