Comparison of hypoxia adapting relative biological effectiveness models for proton therapy
Guillermo Garrido Hernandez,
Norway
OC-0621
Abstract
Comparison of hypoxia adapting relative biological effectiveness models for proton therapy
Authors: Guillermo Garrido Hernandez1, Helge Henjum2, Marte Høiskar1, Tordis Dahle3, Kathrine Redalen1, Kristian Ytre-Hauge2
1Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Physics, Trondheim, Norway; 2University of Bergen, Department of Physics and Technology, Bergen, Norway; 3Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Bergen, Norway
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
In proton therapy, the biological dose (Dbio)
is calculated by means of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). RBE has
been proposed to vary with the linear energy transfer (LET), physical dose and other
factors including the oxygen level in the tumor. Models to calculate Dbio
considering the effect of hypoxic cells typically estimate the oxygen
enhancement ratio (OER) using the partial oxygen pressure (pO2) and
a parameter for the radiation quality such as the LET or the specific energy. Our
aim was to implement and compare different OER models as input to RBE calculation
and to use a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation tool to explore the impact of hypoxia
on Dbio. Hypoxia PET imaging was used to estimate the pO2
in patients in order to investigate the effects of hypoxia adaptation on proton
plans.
Material and Methods
We implemented a calculation for hypoxia-adapted Dbio, i.e.,
the RBE-OER-weighted
dose (ROWD), based on four different approaches
to estimate the OER (Wenzl and Wilkens 2011, Dahle et al. 2020,
Tinganelli et al. 2015, Mein et al. 2021). The OER-calculations were combined with either
a phenomenological RBE model for protons, or the microdosimetric kinetic model
(MKM). First, the FLUKA MC tool was used to simulate a proton beam
irradiating a virtual water phantom with different pO2 levels. Secondly,
a proton plan was made in Eclipse TPS (Varian) for a head and neck cancer case calculating
the pO2 from [18F]-EF5 PET
as input to the OER estimation. For both the phantom and the patient
simulations, the physical dose (D), the hypoxia-adapted linear-quadratic
parameters (αh, βh), the dose-averaged LET (LETd),
and the OER were estimated.
Results
Water phantom simulations using MC showed good agreement with
theoretical OER models. OER estimates corresponded to clinically relevant pO2
values and were similar between models except for the model from Tinganelli et
al. 2015, which estimates approximately a 10% higher OER (Figure 1). At the same time,
the models from Wenzl and Willkens 2011 and Dahle et al. 2020 are more susceptible
to LET variations than the models from Mein et al. 2021 and Tinganelli et
al. 2015 that particularly shows no change for the LET variations on proton
LET scales. The
corresponding depth-dose curves resulted in a ROWD for all implemented models
that followed the same trend with a reduction of the ROWD in the hypoxic
regions (Figure 2). Preliminary results from the patient case indicates an
OER range of 1 to 1.6 in the planning target volume.
Conclusion
We implemented a calculation of Dbio in
FLUKA MC using different OER estimations and variable RBE calculations in order
to perform hypoxia adaptation of proton therapy plans. Application and
comparison of the models showed overall good agreement between different
models, although some variation in LET sensitivity was observed. With reliable hypoxia information, applications of
OER adapted/adapting RBE models could become a useful tool for treatment plan
evaluation and optimization.