Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Monday
May 09
10:30 - 11:30
Auditorium 12
Adaptive radiotherapy
Jessica Rashid, United Kingdom;
Wim Vingerhoed, Belgium
3230
Proffered Papers
RTT
11:00 - 11:10
Assessment of intraprostatic tumour motion in prostate radiotherapy on the MR-Linac
Vickie Kong, Canada
OC-0784

Abstract

Assessment of intraprostatic tumour motion in prostate radiotherapy on the MR-Linac
Authors:

Vickie Kong1, Jerusha Padayachee1, Jeff Winter1, Jennifer Dang1, Winnie Li1, Inmaculada Navarro1, Rachael Glicksman1, Victor Malkov1, Joelle Helou1, Alejandro Berlin1, Peter Chung1

1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

There is increasing interest in dose escalation to the GTV in patients receiving radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. The MR-Linac (MRL) presents a unique opportunity to facilitate this approach through improved target definition and adaptive radiotherapy delivery. We aimed to assess intra-fraction GTV motion during MRL treatment delivery and to evaluate the efficacy of a PTV derived based on internal target volume (ITV).  

Material and Methods

Five patients with an identifiable GTV who received whole gland prostate radiotherapy on the MRL were selected for this retrospective planning study. During each treatment session, three T2 MR images were obtained – localization for adaptation (MRLoc), verification pre-treatment (MRVer), and during beam-on (MRBeamOn). Average session time was 38 minutes. MRLoc and MRBeamOn from 5 treatment sessions for each patient were retrieved. To assess for intra-fraction motion, displacement of the GTV on MRBeamOn was calculated using coordinates of the centre of mass. An ITV was generated summing GTVLoc and GTVBeamOn. Two PTVs were defined to compare dosimetry: GTVLoc + 2 mm (GTV-PTV), and ITV + 2 mm (ITV-PTV). A 9-beam IMRT plan was generated to deliver 15 Gy in a single fraction to each PTV on the MRLoc scans. Rectum, urethra and bladder were included in OAR assessment. 

Results

A total of 50 GTVs and 25 ITVs were analysed. Median GTV was 1.05 cm3 (range: 0.46 – 2.77). Intra-fraction GTV motion was greatest in the transverse direction (mean = 2.2 mm), followed by cranio-caudal (mean = 1.4 mm), and lateral (mean = 0.7 mm). Three of the 5 patients had consistent GTV displacements of < 3mm. In the remaining two patients, shifts of 3.1 – 10.0 mm were demonstrated. Median GTVBeamOn D95% was 16.5 Gy for GTV-PTV (range: 5.5 – 18.9). For ITV-PTV, this was 17.7 Gy (range: 16.3 – 19.5). Median OAR doses were comparable between GTV-PTV and ITV-PTV. Urethra D10% was 10.6 Gy and 10.0 Gy, respectively; rectum D0.5cc 8.2 Gy and 9.2 Gy; and bladder D0.5cc 3.3 Gy and 3.5 Gy. 

Conclusion

Variable intra-fraction shifts in GTV were found between patients, with resultant discrepancies in target coverage. The results suggest that generation of an ITV may allow for improved accuracy in GTV dose escalation on the MRL, whilst maintaining acceptable OAR dose constraints.