Assessment of intraprostatic tumour motion in prostate radiotherapy on the MR-Linac
OC-0784
Abstract
Assessment of intraprostatic tumour motion in prostate radiotherapy on the MR-Linac
Authors: Vickie Kong1, Jerusha Padayachee1, Jeff Winter1, Jennifer Dang1, Winnie Li1, Inmaculada Navarro1, Rachael Glicksman1, Victor Malkov1, Joelle Helou1, Alejandro Berlin1, Peter Chung1
1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
There
is increasing interest in dose escalation to the GTV in patients receiving
radiotherapy for localised prostate
cancer. The MR-Linac (MRL) presents a unique opportunity to facilitate this
approach through improved target definition and adaptive radiotherapy delivery.
We aimed to assess intra-fraction GTV motion during MRL treatment delivery and to evaluate the efficacy of a PTV derived based on internal target volume (ITV).
Material and Methods
Five
patients with an identifiable GTV who received whole gland prostate radiotherapy
on the MRL were selected for this retrospective planning study. During each treatment
session, three T2 MR images were obtained – localization for adaptation (MRLoc),
verification pre-treatment (MRVer), and during beam-on (MRBeamOn).
Average session time was 38 minutes. MRLoc
and MRBeamOn from 5 treatment sessions for each
patient were retrieved. To assess for intra-fraction motion, displacement of
the GTV on MRBeamOn was calculated using coordinates of the centre of mass. An ITV was generated summing
GTVLoc and GTVBeamOn. Two PTVs were defined to compare
dosimetry: GTVLoc + 2 mm (GTV-PTV), and ITV + 2 mm (ITV-PTV). A
9-beam IMRT plan was generated to deliver 15 Gy in a single fraction to each
PTV on the MRLoc scans. Rectum, urethra and bladder were included in
OAR assessment.
Results
A
total of 50 GTVs and 25 ITVs were analysed. Median
GTV was 1.05 cm3 (range: 0.46 – 2.77). Intra-fraction GTV motion was
greatest in the transverse direction (mean = 2.2 mm), followed by cranio-caudal
(mean = 1.4 mm), and lateral (mean = 0.7 mm). Three of the 5 patients had consistent
GTV displacements of < 3mm. In the remaining two patients, shifts of
3.1 – 10.0 mm were demonstrated. Median
GTVBeamOn D95% was 16.5 Gy for GTV-PTV (range: 5.5 – 18.9). For
ITV-PTV, this was 17.7 Gy (range: 16.3 – 19.5). Median OAR doses were
comparable between GTV-PTV and ITV-PTV. Urethra D10% was 10.6 Gy and 10.0 Gy, respectively;
rectum D0.5cc 8.2 Gy and 9.2 Gy; and bladder D0.5cc 3.3 Gy and 3.5 Gy.
Conclusion
Variable
intra-fraction shifts in GTV were found between patients, with resultant
discrepancies in target coverage. The results suggest that generation of an ITV
may allow for improved accuracy in GTV dose escalation on the MRL, whilst
maintaining acceptable OAR dose constraints.