Surface imaging to track inter-fractional anatomical variation in paediatric abdominal radiotherapy.
Sabrina Taylor,
United Kingdom
OC-0786
Abstract
Surface imaging to track inter-fractional anatomical variation in paediatric abdominal radiotherapy.
Authors: Sabrina Taylor1, Pei Lim2, Jessica Cantwell2, Derek D’Souza2, Syed Moinuddin2, Yen Ching-Chang2, Mark Gaze2, Jennifer Gains2, Catarina Veiga1
1University College London, Centre for Medical Image Computing, London, United Kingdom; 2University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy, London, United Kingdom
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Proton
therapy is promising in the treatment of abdominal paediatric malignancies due
to its potential in reducing treatment side effects. However, inter-fractional
variation in gastrointestinal (GI) gas volume and position may lead to
under/over-shooting, compromising target coverage. We investigated the use of surface
imaging in paediatric settings to monitor interfractional anatomical variation,
by correlating internal variation in GI gas volume with simulated external
metrics of surface change.
Material and Methods
Data
from 21 patients treated with IMAT for abdominal high-risk neuroblastoma
(median age 4, range 2-19 y) were used in this study. The body and GI gas volumes
were semi-automatically delineated
on 21 CT and 77 weekly CBCT scans using ITK-Snap. The CBCTs were rigidly
co-registered to the CT using NiftyReg, and both scans translated to treatment
isocenter. CBCTs were considered as treatment position, while the CT was the
reference position. Quantitative metrics of internal and surface changes were
calculated for each pair of CT/CBCT scans within the common imaging field-of-view,
as defined in Fig.1. Surface parameters
were simulated from the body contour. The anterior surface was extracted from
the body and converted to a point cloud. Point clouds were registered using the
iterative closest point algorithm in MATLAB to estimate the translational and rotational corrections needed to align the CBCT
surface to the reference. These metrics are surrogates to the correction that
would have been obtained with surface imaging in treatment position. GI gas variation was then correlated with all metrics.
Statistical analysis was performed in Stata 16.1 (5% significance level).
Results
We found a ΔVgas, Δdbody and Δdsurface of
-75.5±113.7ml, -1.1±1.5mm and -2.6±3.3mm, respectively, when pooling all data
for analyses. There was a trend of reduction in GI gas and body contour from
planning. Separation of body contour and surface correlated moderately to
strongly with GI gas (Fig.2). A stronger correlation was found between ΔVgas and Δdsurface (R=0.58)
than between ΔVgas and Δdbody (R=0.46).
Regarding metrics of surface correction, the strongest correlation with ΔVgas was
found for tY (R=0.58) and rx (R=-0.35),
anterior-posterior translation and rotation of the left-right axis,
respectively. These findings suggest that anterior surface changes were likely
more affected by abdominal distension caused by GI gas, while body contour
changes were possibly more affected by other inter-fractional variations such
as weight fluctuation and setup errors.
Conclusion
Interfractional
variation in GI gas volume correlated well with surface variation metrics. Surface
imaging may be useful to inform paediatric image guidance protocols and reduce
the need for CBCT and associated dose burden, by predicting timepoints with
internal changes that warrant additional volumetric imaging. Further work is
required to validate our findings using real instead of simulated surface imaging
data.