Impact of RT dose and fractionation on biomarkers of systemic immune responses in early stage NSCLC
OC-0257
Abstract
Impact of RT dose and fractionation on biomarkers of systemic immune responses in early stage NSCLC
Authors: Eleni Gkika1, Elke Firat2, Sonja Adebahr1, Ilinca Popp1, Gianluca Radicioni1, Jan Exner1, Alexander Rühle1, Tanja Sprave1, Ursula Nestle1, Nils Nicolay1, Gabriele Niedermann3, Dan Duda4, Anca-L. Grosu1
1University Medical Center Freiburg, Radiation Oncology, Freiburg, Germany; 2University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Radiation Biology, Freiburg, Germany; 3University Medical Center Freiburg, Radiation Oncology, Radiation Biology, Freiburg, Germany; 4Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, E. L. Steele Laboratories for Tumor Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, USA
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Ionizing radiation is used to induce cytotoxicity in
cancer, but it can also induce immune-modulatory effects, which may stimulate
or inhibit anti-tumor immunity. In this prospective study, we aimed to further
understand the immunomodulatory effects of SBRT through the longitudinal
assessment of blood circulating cellular biomarkers during and after SBRT. The
goal was to generate a hypothesis for the optimal dose and fractionation for
combining SBRT with standard immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) drugs for NSCLC.
Material and Methods
50 patients with eraly stage NSCLC were prospectively included. Blood samples were obtained just before treatment (RTbaseline),
1 day after the first fraction of SBRT (RTday1), at the end of SBRT
(RTend) and at follow-up after 6 weeks (RTFU1) and 4.5
months after the start of the treatment (RTFU2). Patients received SBRT
using the following fractionation/dose regimens: 3 x 18.75 Gy (n=21), 5 x 10 Gy
(n=6), 8 x 7.5 Gy (n=21) and 12 x 5.5 Gy (n=1), with a minimum biological
effective dose of 100 Gy.
Results
We found a statistically significant increase
in the fraction of expanding (Ki-67+) CD8+ and CD4+
T-cells, in both in PD1+ and PD1– subpopulations, after SBRT
(RTend) compared to baseline, and a decrease to baseline levels after 6 weeks
(RTFU1). These results remained significant in the fractionation/dose
subgroup analysis for the patients treated with 8 x 7.5 Gy but not for those treated
with 3 x 18.75 Gy.
Conclusion
Study results indicate that SBRT results in
significant systemic increase in activated T cells, which is most prominent at
the end of treatment, and that lower doses per fraction might be more effective
in inducing this immunomodulatory effect than the higher ones. Based on these
data, we suggest that adding ICIs in NSCLC would be more effective applied at
the end of SBRT performed with lower doses per fraction.