Monte Carlo study of high atomic number inorganic scintillators for Ir-192 BT in vivo dosimetry
OC-0115
Abstract
Monte Carlo study of high atomic number inorganic scintillators for Ir-192 BT in vivo dosimetry
Authors: Vaiva Kaveckyte1,2, Erik Buch Jørgensen3,4, Jacob Graversen Johansen3,4, Åsa Carlsson Tedgren1,5,6
1Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping, Sweden; 2Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus, Denmark; 4Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark; 5Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden; 6Karolinska Institute, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Stockholm, Sweden
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
High
atomic number (Z) inorganic scintillators have properties suitable for 192Ir BT in
vivo dosimetry. Compared to organic
scintillators, they have greater light output and
negligible stem-effect. However, high Z leads to larger
absorbed-dose energy dependence which requires thorough characterization. Up to
now, experimental determination is prevalent though measurement accuracy can be
compromised by steep dose gradients. Additionally, the measured signal may be
convolved with other detector response artifacts that are not accounted for. Monte
Carlo (MC) circumvents such problems and allows for broader investigation
of factors affecting the absorbed-dose energy dependence of detectors under
clinically relevant conditions. Therefore, aiming to improve in vivo dosimetry
accuracy, three inorganic scintillators, which have been used in practice and
have suitable luminescence properties, were characterized with MC in this
study.
Material and Methods
The focus was on ZnSe (Z=32), and for comparison, CsI (Z=54) and Al2O3
(Z=11) were included. A
general-purpose MC code PENELOPE was used to evaluate detector absorbed-dose
energy response relative to water and its dependence on scatter conditions (full and patient-like), as well as patient anatomy (pelvic bones and
prostate calcifications).
Results
ZnSe and CsI overresponded substantially compared to water in a patient-like phantom, but the normalized curves, which
would correspond to the absorbed-dose energy correction, did not differ
between the two media despite large difference in their atomic numbers (Fig. 1). Under full-scatter conditions, ZnSe response increased by 10% at 5 cm compared to limited scatter conditions, whereas the response of Al2O3
did not depend on phantom size. Pelvic bones did not affect ZnSe response in a
mimicked prostate treatment. However, it decreased by 2% when an intermediate-size calcification was between the source and the detector. Finally, comparison with
high-precision experimental data of ZnSe:O response showed good agreement with the MC results (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1: a) MC-calculated ratios of the average
absorbed dose to the detector cavity and water as a function of radial distance; b) Values
normalized at 2 cm distance.
Fig. 2: MC-calculated ratios of the average
absorbed dose to ZnSe detector and absorbed dose to water as a function
of radial distance. All values were normalized to the ratio
at 2 cm distance.
Conclusion
Experimental
determination of absorbed-dose energy dependence of high-Z detectors should
be performed under patient-like scattering conditions instead of adhering to
TG-43 formalism. Additionally, it must be accounted for that the dependence is
a function of radial distance and polar angle. While in these aspects
inorganic scintillators are disadvantageous compared to the organic ones, we
show that MC methods can aid and complement their characterization under
clinically relevant conditions. Thus, allowing to introduce new detectors into
the field that may benefit 192Ir BT in vivo dosimetry.