Randomised phase 2 trial of preop chemo(radio)therapy in gastric cancer: CRITICS-II interim results
Marcel Verheij,
The Netherlands
OC-0107
Abstract
Randomised phase 2 trial of preop chemo(radio)therapy in gastric cancer: CRITICS-II interim results
Authors: Marcel Verheij1,2, Astrid E. Slagter1, Edwin P.M. Jansen1, Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven3, Annemieke Cats4, Johanna van Sandick5, Nicole C.T. van Grieken6, Pietje Muller7, Karolina Sikorska7
1Netherlands Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Radboud University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; 3Amsterdam UMC, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 4Netherlands Cancer Institute, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 5Netherlands Cancer Institute, Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 6Amsterdam UMC, Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 7Netherlands Cancer Institute, Biometrics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Perioperative chemotherapy (CT) and
postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are standard treatment options for
locally advanced resectable gastric cancer. From the CRITICS and other studies it
is known that these multimodality regimens are associated with poor patient
tolerability, especially in the postoperative phase. The CRITICS-II trial was
designed to identify the optimal preoperative strategy in resectable gastric
cancer by comparing 3 arms. A preplanned interim analysis (IA) was performed and
reviewed by the Independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee to determine any
imbalances between the 3 arms that could necessitate the discontinuation of any
of the treatment arms.
Material and Methods
CRITICS-II is a randomised phase II trial
evaluating 3 experimental preoperative treatment arms independently according
to the “pick the winner” principle. Patients are randomised to: 4 cycles of
docetaxel/oxaliplatin/capecitabine (DOC); 2 cycles of DOC followed by CRT (45
Gy with weekly carboplatin/docetaxel; DOC-CRT); or CRT only. Primary endpoint
is event-free survival at 1 year; secondary endpoints are time to event, time
to recurrence, R0 resection rate, pCR rate, complications, toxicity and overall
survival. Here, we report the results of the IA with a focus on baseline
characteristics, patient compliance, surgical and pathology details,
complications and toxicity.
Results
At a median follow-up of 14 months, 119 randomised
patients were eligible for this IA. No significant imbalances were found in
baseline characteristics. Completion of preoperative treatment for the total
group was 89%. Main reasons for not completing preoperative treatment were
toxicity (n=7), death (n=2), disease progression (n=1) and patient’s refusal (n=1).
Surgery was performed in 92% of patients. Reasons for not proceeding to surgery
were disease progression (n=4), toxicity (n=3) and patient’s refusal (n=1).
Surgery was with curative intent in 99% of patients, and involved a total
gastrectomy in 51% and a D2 lymph node dissection in 93%. In-hospital mortality
was 6%. Surgical complications occurred in 18% and consisted of anastomotic
leakage (n=7), bleeding (n=2), fistula (n=1), ileus (n=1), necrosis (n=1) and
other (n=5). R0 resection was obtained in 95% and the median number of lymph
nodes was 22. The percentage of patients who completed treatment according to
protocol was 80% for the total group. Main reasons for not completing were
disease progression (6%), toxicity (5%), death (5%) and patient’s refusal (1%).
Maximum grade 3-5 any toxicity was 61%; grade 5 toxicity was 8%. Cause of death
was of infectious (n=5) or pulmonary (n=4) origin.
Conclusion
Interim results from the CRITICS-II trial
showed a high patient compliance rate. Treatment-related toxicity and surgical
morbidity were significant, but in line with previous studies. No major
imbalances were detected between the 3 preoperative treatment arms; accrual continues
as planned up to a total of 207 patients.